Kepler's 2nd.law and calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter shounakbhatta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
Kepler's Second Law relates to the conservation of angular momentum, where the area swept out by a planet in its orbit is proportional to the time taken. The area of a triangle can be calculated using the formula 1/2 base x height, with the base defined as the arc length (dx) and height (h). For elliptical orbits, the relationship between radius (r), arc length (ds), and speed (v) is crucial, particularly at the ends of the major axis. However, at other points in the orbit, the angle between r and ds requires the inclusion of a sine or cosine factor for accurate area calculation. Understanding these nuances is essential for correctly applying Kepler's Second Law in various orbital scenarios.
shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Hello,

While dealing with Kepler's 2nd.law, when calculating the area of the triangle which sweeps out:


Area of a triangle = 1/2 base x height

Now, we know dθ = dx/r (where dx = arc length, r=radius)

So, dx= rdθ

So, area of a triangle = 1/2 base(rdθ) x height(h)

Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If dx is defined to be something like an "arc length in tangential direction", yes. It is not the actual arc length if the motion is not circular.
 
Keep in mind that Kepler's Second Law is just another way of saying that angular momentum is conserved. In other words, ##\omega r^2## is a constant. Keeping in mind that for a small section h = r, this is in agreement with what you wrote.
 
Thank you very much for letting me clear the confusion.
 
Hope I'm not going to regenerate the confusion, but for an elliptical orbit there are just two places where the triangle area is given by \frac{1}{2} r\ ds = \frac{1}{2} rv\ dt, and those are the two ends of the major axis. [I'm using ds as infinitesimal portion of arc length, r as distance from focus and v as speed of orbiting body.]

At every other point, r and ds are not perpendicular to each other, so a sine or cosine factor has to be inserted.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top