Kerr metric derivation (Adler, Bazin & Schiffer)

seanjadson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a problem understanding part of Adler, Bazin and Schiffer's (Introduction to General Relativity 2nd Edition) derivation of the Kerr metric. I would be grateful if someone could explain where I am going wrong. My problem concerns the transition from the O(m2) equation (7.15b) to (7.24). For the first term of (7.15b) I get:

m2.lm.ln[4(A.la)|a-8A2]

while for the second term (INCLUDING the minus sign preceding the 2 Minkowski metrics):

m2.lm.ln[-6A2-2.la|b.lb|a+2.la|b.la|b]

Adding these 2 expressions does not produce a factor of the LHS of (7.24), although subtracting them does.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found my mistake; the first term should be the negative of that shown.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top