Kinetic and potential energies of a harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
In a harmonic oscillator, the average potential and kinetic energies in the quantum case are both E/2, which aligns with classical values. The discussion emphasizes that the quantum oscillator's energies depend on average values, similar to classical mechanics where energy is conserved. Participants confirm that calculating the average values for kinetic and potential energies in both cases shows they are equivalent. The problem essentially asks for a comparison of these expectation values, which have been found to be the same. This highlights the consistency between quantum and classical harmonic oscillators in terms of energy distribution.
Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
Problem:

In a harmonic oscillator

\left\langle V \right\rangle=\left\langle K \right\rangle=\frac{E_{0}}{2}

How does this result compare with the classical values of K and V?

Solution:

For a classical harmonic oscillator

V=1/2kx^2
K=1/2mv^2

I don't really know where to begin. Is it safe to say that quantum oscillator must depend on the average values of the kinetic and potential energies? Also, the values of the energies in the classical system are conserved in such a way to conserve total mechanical energy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the problem statement telling you that the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies are each E/2 in the quantum case?

If so then perhaps it wants you to calculate the average values in the classical case and show that they're the same.
 
Pagan Harpoon said:
Is the problem statement telling you that the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies are each E/2 in the quantum case?

If so then perhaps it wants you to calculate the average values in the classical case and show that they're the same.

Oh yes, I've already done that. I calculated <U> and <K> separately.
 
Then haven't you already solved the problem? If you have the expectation values for the kinetic and potential energies in both the classical and quantum cases, then you can compare them and see that they are the same.

Is the question asking you for something more?
 
The question is simply asking to compare the expectation values <V> and <K> of the quantum harmonic oscillator (given above) with the classical values of V and K.
 
Last edited:
If I were faced with that question, I would calculate the average values for V and K in the classical case (which you have done) and then comment that they are the same as the expectation values in the quantum case - that's how they compare, they're the same.

What more do you want to do?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top