Kinetic Energy of two Rolling Objects on a Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total kinetic energy of a system consisting of a hollow cylinder and a smaller solid cylinder rolling inside it on an incline. The kinetic energy for the large cylinder is straightforward, incorporating both translational and rotational components. The challenge arises in determining the kinetic energy of the smaller cylinder, which involves translational kinetic energy, rotational kinetic energy, and an additional term related to its motion along the rim of the larger cylinder. Participants emphasize the importance of recognizing that the angular velocities of the two cylinders differ due to their respective radii. Clarification is sought on the additional term found in a proposed solution, which adds complexity to the kinetic energy calculations.
interference
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, not a homework problem, just something I was thinking about when I found in a book.

Homework Statement



A hollow Cylinder is rolling down an incline of angle theta. Inside the cylinder is a smaller solid cylinder rolling freely inside it. (Refer to diagram)

4658180035_bb2d74b463_b.jpg


Given an x coordinate from the top of the slope which the cylinders were released, and:

Large Cylinder has mass M, moment of inertia I, radius R
Small cylinder has mass m, moment of inertia i, radius r
(p.s. I labeled the small mass m wongly in the diagram!)

The small cylinder is allowed to roll freely in the large cylinder, and we call the angle it makes from vertical phi.

What is the Total Kinetic Energy of the system?

Homework Equations



v=rw
K=(1/2)Iw^2 > where w is angular velocity

The Attempt at a Solution



The Kinetic Energy for the Large Cylinder seems straightforward:

<br /> K=\frac{1}{2}\left(M\dot{x}^2+\frac{I\dot{x}^2}{R^2}\right)<br />
which is the translational KE and the rotational KE.

However, I am not sure about about the smaller cylinder. I believe there are 3 parts to its KE, namely the translational KE, the KE associated with it doing a circular motion on the rim of the large cylinder (I use the parallel axis theorem), and its own rotational KE.

<br /> K=\frac{1}{2}\left(m\dot{x}^2+\left(i+m\left(R-r\right)^2\right)\dot{\phi}^2+\frac{i\dot{x}^2}{r^2}\right)<br />

However, I am unsure about this because the small cylinder is also rotating somewhat around the large cylinder which is itself rolling down the slope.

Any advice or help is appreciated! Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the last term should be multiplied my R^2 / r^2.

we assume there is no slip at the contact between the 2 cyls. so the (translational) velocities of the points of contact between the 2 cyl is the same.

so R*w1 = r*w2

w2 = (R/r)*w1

this brings in the extra factor

the mistake you made was in assuming the same w for both the cylinders
 
Last edited:
graphene said:
the last term should be multiplied my R^2 / r^2.

we assume there is no slip at the contact between the 2 cyls. so the (translational) velocities of the points of contact between the 2 cyl is the same.

so R*w1 = r*w2

w2 = (R/r)*w1

this brings in the extra factor

the mistake you made was in assuming the same w for both the cylinders
Hi,

I did know that the angular velocities for each cylinders are different

<br /> v=R\omega_{M}=r\omega_{m} <br />, thus

<br /> \omega_{m}=\frac{\dot{x}}{rR}R=\frac{\dot{x}}{r}<br />

Which I have taken into account already in the last term which is the small cylinder's own rotational kinetic energy about its own axis.

Also, I found a solution which adds another term:

<br /> m\dot{x}\dot{\phi}\left(R-r\right)\left(\frac{i}{mr^2}+cos\left(\phi+\theta\right)\right)<br />

But I do not understand where that comes from. Can anyone please help shed some light?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top