Kinetic theory - Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function qualifies as a cumulative distribution function (CDF). It is established that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution has both a probability density function and a CDF, with the latter being the integral of the former. The user expresses confusion about why the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution does not resemble the general form of a CDF, which is derived from a probability mass function. They mention difficulties in understanding derivations of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution and note that their own attempts led to a different result. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in grasping the mathematical foundations of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
realitybugll
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
My (first) question is - is a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function a "cumulative distribution function."?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is a continuous probability distribution of continuous variables, so it has both a probability density function and a cumulative distribution function where the latter is just an integral over the former.
 
Ah, ok. I appreciate your reply.

I guess I'm wondering then why the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution doesn't just take the general form of the cumulative distribution function (the derivative of which is the probability mass function) with appropriate constants.

Here are pictures of the equations of each -

probability mass function:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/c/1/0c1ae7a35c20afa9f189dffa5d3c0c23.png

cumulative distribution function:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/3/4/334f6d225a50d1e4777b8e7915215577.png

both are located in the binomial distribution article -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution

I don't follow any derivations of the maxwell-boltzmann distribution I've found (I probably should work harder to understand), and when I tried to derive it myself I got the cumulative distribution function. The problem with this is (a) it's somehow different than the maxwell-boltzmann distribution, and (b) I have no idea how to evaluate it.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top