Kronecker sum of more than two matrices?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of extending the concept of the Kronecker sum to more than two matrices, specifically in the context of Hamiltonians in physics. The user seeks to express the total Hamiltonian as a sum of Kronecker products involving identity matrices and individual Hamiltonians. They note that the Kronecker sum is only defined for pairs of matrices and emphasize the importance of the order in which matrices are combined. A proposed solution involves using the associative property of the Kronecker sum to incorporate additional Hamiltonians. The conversation highlights the need for clarity and correctness in mathematical representation when dealing with multiple matrices.
Earthland
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question arises from this quote from wikipedia's article about kronecker product:

Kronecker sums appear naturally in physics when considering ensembles of non-interacting systems. Let Hi be the Hamiltonian of the i-th such system. Then the total Hamiltonian of the ensemble is
c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


I have to write this Htot as a ordinary sum over kronecker products of unity matrix and Hi-s.

Homework Equations



Kronecker sum for two matrices is defined as

3f1676452a4f1311f5d7a165e319b184.png


If A is n × n, B is m × m and Ik denotes the k × k identity matrix.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, as I undesratnd, now instead of A and B we have simply Hi and there should be sum kind of sum over i. But the Kronecker sum is defined only for a pair of matrices and it isn't commutative, so the order is important. I tried something like this, for three H-s:

upload_2015-2-27_12-59-47.png


But it doesn't look very elegant and I have no idea if this could be true. Any advice?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    upload_2015-2-27_12-22-46.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 600
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition is as follows

c2e0b6679eb0d88a8ec2d35a7d1a448f.png


H_{\text{Tot}} =\left( H_1 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right)+ \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes H_2 \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes ... \right) + \left(\mathbb{I} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes H_3 \otimes ... \right) + ...
 
Are you sure? Thank you!
 
Proof:
Kronecker sum is associative.

In other words.
The Kronecker sum of two matrices is, as you wrote,
X=A\oplus B = A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B}

Now, since the sum ##A\oplus B## is a matrix, ##X##, the Kronecker sum
Y= X\oplus C = X\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes C = (A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes{B})\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_X\otimes{C}
Of course ##\mathbb{I}_X=\mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B##, which gives
Y= A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes B\otimes\mathbb{I}_C + \mathbb{I}_A\otimes\mathbb{I}_B\otimes{C}

##Z= Y\oplus D = ## Keep going... :)
 
Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top