Lagrange equation for block and incline

In summary, the Lagrange equation for a block on an incline involves formulating the system's kinetic and potential energy to derive the equations of motion. By defining generalized coordinates, the Lagrangian is expressed as the difference between kinetic energy (due to the block's motion) and potential energy (related to its height on the incline). This approach simplifies the analysis of dynamic systems, allowing for the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to find the motion of the block under the influence of gravity and friction.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1714182484636.png

Does someone please know where the term highlighted in blue came from?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: Please see below

For this problem,
View attachment 344125
Does someone please know where the term highlighted in blue came from?

Thanks!
Write the kinetic energy of the block in the inertial frame. ##\dot y ## is w.r.t. the ( accelerating) wedge.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #3
erobz said:
Write the kinetic energy of the block in the inertial frame. ##\dot y ## is w.r.t. the ( accelerating) wedge.
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

##T = \frac{1m}{2}(\dot x)^2 + \frac{1m}{2}(\dot y)^2##

Is the please correct?

THanks!
 
  • #4
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

##T = 1/2m\dotx + 1/2m\doty##

Is the please correct?

THanks!
No, it is incorrect (even including if you add the missing squares). Note that the x and y directions of motion for the block are not orthogonal.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #5
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

##T = \frac{1m}{2}(\dot x)^2 + \frac{1m}{2}(\dot y)^2##

Is the please correct?

THanks!
No. The wedge is moving with velocity ##\dot x##, the block is riding on the wedge. ##\dot y## is with respect to the wedge, the wedge is not an inertial frame.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #6
Orodruin said:
No, it is incorrect (even including if you add the missing squares). Note that the x and y directions of motion for the block are not orthogonal.
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

Sorry I am confused. I know the axes are not orthongal, put that does not make a difference does it (since the velocity is both along the axes)?

Thanks!
 
  • #7
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @Orodruin!

Sorry I am confused. I know the axes are not orthongal, put that does not make a difference does it (since the velocity is both along the axes)?

Thanks!
Pretend you are standing in the ground watching this unfold. What velocity do you measure for the block in the horizontal and vertical directions? Remember ##\dot y ## is being measured with respect to the wedge.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #8
ChiralSuperfields said:
put that does not make a difference does it
It most certainly does. Imagine for example that they were parallel. What would the speed be?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and erobz
  • #9
ChiralSuperfields said:
Does someone please know where the term highlighted in blue came from?
The drawing is misleading. It shows two arrows labeled ##\dot x##, one on the wedge and another to the right of the sliding block. The first arrow clearly represents the horizontal velocity of the wedge relative to the ground. The second arrow is meant to be the horizontal velocity of the sliding block relative to the ground. It cannot be given the same symbol because it is the horizontal velocity of the sliding block relative to the wedge plus the horizontal velocity of the wedge relative to the ground ##\dot x##. The highlighted term is the cross term that arises when you square the correct expression for the horizontal velocity of the block relative to the ground.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and member 731016
  • #10
erobz said:
Pretend you are standing in the ground watching this unfold. What velocity do you measure for the block in the horizontal and vertical directions? Remember ##\dot y ## is being measured with respect to the wedge.
Orodruin said:
It most certainly does. Imagine for example that they were parallel. What would the speed be?
kuruman said:
The drawing is misleading. It shows two arrows labeled ##\dot x##, one on the wedge and another to the right of the sliding block. The first arrow clearly represents the horizontal velocity of the wedge relative to the ground. The second arrow is meant to be the horizontal velocity of the sliding block relative to the ground. It cannot be given the same symbol because it is the horizontal velocity of the sliding block relative to the wedge plus the horizontal velocity of the wedge relative to the ground ##\dot x##. The highlighted term is the cross term that arises when you square the correct expression for the horizontal velocity of the block relative to the ground.
Thank you for your replies @erobz , @Orodruin and @kuruman!


I had another think about this and since the time derivative vectors of x and y, they form a non-right angle triangle, so I must use the cosine rule I think to find the correct magnitude of the velocity where I think the extra term comes from. Thanks!
 
  • #11
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your replies @erobz , @Orodruin and @kuruman!


I had another think about this and since the time derivative vectors of x and y, they form a non-right angle triangle, so I must use the cosine rule I think to find the correct magnitude of the velocity where I think the extra term comes from. Thanks!
I doesn’t sound to me like you understand the crux of the problem yet.

Let’s start with the straightforward part. What is the vertical component of the blocks velocity in the ground frame?
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #12
erobz said:
I doesn’t sound to me like you understand the crux of the problem yet.

Let’s start with the straightforward part. What is the vertical component of the blocks velocity in the ground frame?
The cosine rule is perfectly fine to use for addition of velocities here.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and erobz
  • #13
To add to what @Orodruin just said (and since I’d already done a diagram!), vector-addition of the 2 velocities using the cosine rule is a simple approach:
block and wedge.gif

Remembering that ##\cos(\alpha) = -\cos(180^o - \alpha)##.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016, Orodruin and erobz
  • #14
Orodruin said:
The cosine rule is perfectly fine to use for addition of velocities here.
Ok, I wasn’t familiar with it by name.
 

FAQ: Lagrange equation for block and incline

What is the Lagrange equation?

The Lagrange equation is a fundamental equation in classical mechanics that describes the motion of a system in terms of its kinetic and potential energy. It is derived from the principle of least action and is used to derive the equations of motion for a system by expressing them in a form that accounts for constraints and generalized coordinates.

How do you set up the Lagrange equation for a block on an incline?

To set up the Lagrange equation for a block on an incline, you first identify the generalized coordinates. For a block sliding down an incline, you can use the angle of the incline (θ) or the position of the block along the incline (s). Next, you determine the kinetic energy (T) and potential energy (V) of the system. The Lagrangian (L) is then defined as L = T - V, and the Lagrange equation is formulated as d/dt(∂L/∂q̇) - ∂L/∂q = 0, where q represents the generalized coordinates.

What are the kinetic and potential energies of a block on an incline?

The kinetic energy (T) of a block sliding down an incline can be expressed as T = (1/2)mv², where m is the mass of the block and v is its velocity. For a block on an incline, the velocity can be related to the angle of the incline and the gravitational acceleration. The potential energy (V) is given by V = mgh, where h is the height of the block above a reference level, which can be expressed in terms of the angle of the incline and the distance along the incline.

What role do constraints play in the Lagrange equation for a block on an incline?

Constraints are conditions that limit the motion of a system. In the case of a block on an incline, the constraint is that the block can only move along the surface of the incline. This constraint can be incorporated into the Lagrangian formulation by choosing appropriate generalized coordinates that account for the motion along the incline, which simplifies the analysis and allows for the derivation of the equations of motion without explicitly solving for forces.

How can the Lagrange equation be used to find the equations of motion for a block on an incline?

To find the equations of motion for a block on an incline using the Lagrange equation, you first calculate the Lagrangian (L = T - V) based on the identified kinetic and potential energies. Then, you apply the Lagrange equation d/dt(∂L/∂q̇) - ∂L/∂q = 0 for the chosen generalized coordinates. This process results in a

Similar threads

Back
Top