Quantum Landau vs Griffith QM textbook

AI Thread Summary
When considering a course in quantum mechanics that utilizes Landau's books, it's important to assess the level of difficulty. Landau's texts are regarded as more advanced than Griffiths, which may indicate that Griffiths could be insufficient if the course is already challenging. For a balanced approach, alternatives like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji are suggested as they may provide a suitable middle ground between the two extremes. Engaging with multiple resources can enhance understanding, making it beneficial to explore various texts on the subject.
hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Landau is more advanced than Griffiths. If you “require” Griffiths, the course might be too advanced. That being said, reading multiple discussions on a topic can be helpful.
 
hagopbul said:
Taking a course In quantum mechanics to review my old courses in physics, they are going to use landau books , should I also consider Griffith

Best Regards
H
Griffiths is too basic and Landau is too advanced. Why not go into something in-between like Sakurai or Cohen-Tannoudji?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Comparing Griffiths with Landau should be done tomorrow.
 
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
753
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Back
Top