Latex code for the class SE of short exact sequences in Mod_R

In summary, the conversation discusses the attempt to use Latex Code to achieve the same fancy script for S and E as seen in Paul E Bland's text "Rings and Their Modules". However, while the code for E seems to be correct, the code for S does not match Bland's script. The conversation ends with a request for help in achieving the same script for S. A suggested solution is provided through an answer on StackExchange, mentioning the use of the mt package for the "Embellished" variant of Bland's script.
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I just uploaded a post on the class SE of short exact sequences in Mod_R ... and tried to use Latex Code to achieve the same fancy script for S and E as Paul E Bland used in his text "Rings and Their Modules" ... but seemingly did not achieve the right script for S (E seems OK, or at least close) ... can someone please help with the correct Latex code ...

The relevant text from Bland's text is as follows:View attachment 3624
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3625I tried \mathscr{S} \mathscr{E} for the script SE and got the following:

\(\displaystyle \mathscr{S} \mathscr{E}
\)but as you can see the S does not look quite the same as Bland's for some reason ...

Can someone please help me to achieve the same S as Bland uses?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
See this answer on StackExchange. Bland's variant seems to be the first under the heading "Embellished" and is provided by the [m]mt[/m] package.
 

FAQ: Latex code for the class SE of short exact sequences in Mod_R

What is the purpose of the SE class in Mod_R?

The SE class in Mod_R is used to represent short exact sequences in a category of modules over a fixed ring R. This class allows for the manipulation and study of these sequences within the framework of category theory and abstract algebra.

How is the SE class defined in Latex code?

The SE class is defined in Latex code by using the \DeclareMathOperator command to create a new operator for the class, followed by the name of the class (in this case, SE) and the corresponding code for the desired symbol or operator.

Can I customize the Latex code for the SE class?

Yes, you can customize the Latex code for the SE class by using different symbols or operators to represent the class, depending on your preferences or the conventions of your field of study.

Are there any specific packages or settings required to use the SE class in Latex?

No, there are no specific packages or settings required to use the SE class in Latex. However, it is recommended to use the amsmath and amssymb packages for mathematical symbols and operators.

Are there any limitations to using the SE class in Latex?

The SE class in Latex is designed for use with short exact sequences in the category of modules over a fixed ring R. It may not be applicable for other types of sequences or categories, and may require modifications for use in those contexts.

Similar threads

LaTeX Why Is My LaTeX Code Not Working?
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Special script for 'm' in Bland Proposition 2.2.11
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Help with Subscripts in Bland's "Rings and Their Modules
Replies
13
Views
5K
LaTeX How can I incorporate a fancy script-like F in my LaTeX code?
Replies
9
Views
4K
MHB Sub-Category of Short Exact Sequences - Bland pages 85-86
Replies
1
Views
1K
LaTeX Share Latex Code Easily: Tips and Tricks
Replies
16
Views
3K
LaTeX Why is 'pdflatex -halt-on-error -interaction=batchmode' failing?
Replies
5
Views
2K
LaTeX How can I produce a long over-arrow for a symbol in Latex?
Replies
3
Views
6K
I Finitely Generated Modules and Maximal Submodules
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Start on Bland Problem 1, Problem Set 4.1: Generating & Cogenerating Modules
2
Replies
37
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top