Law of Conservation of Energy of a downhill skier

AI Thread Summary
A skier begins with an initial speed of 0.434 m/s and travels down a slope of 27.6° for 80.4 m before ascending another slope of 20.7° for 70.4 m. The discussion revolves around applying the law of conservation of energy to determine the skier's speed at the top of the second hill. Participants clarify that the distances provided are not heights, and the correct approach involves using trigonometric functions to find the actual heights based on the angles. Ultimately, the correct calculations lead to a final speed of 15.6 m/s for the skier at the top of the hill. Understanding the relationship between distance and height using sine is emphasized as a key takeaway.
darkmasterz8
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. A skier is pushed from the top of a hill so that he starts moving down the hillside sloped at 27.6° to the horizontal with an initial speed of 0.434 m/s. After traveling 80.4 m, he reaches the bottom of the valley. Due to inertia, he then continues 70.4 m up another hillside sloped at 20.7° to the horizontal. What is the skier's speed when he reaches the top of the hill? Assume that you can neglect friction.
2. KE(b)+PE(b)=KE(a)+PE(a)
KE(b)+PE(b)=KE(a)+PE
1/2*m*(.434^2)+m*9.8*80.4=1/2*m*v^2+m*9.8*70.4---X out all m since they're the same both sides

.09+787.9=1/2*v^2+689.9
788=1/2*v^2+689.9
98.11=1/2*v^2
196=v^2
14=v

I already know the answer is 15.6 but I don't seem to get it through the work I've done. What I'm confused on is if 80.4 and 70.4 are the height? The problem makes it sound more like distance which doesn't make sense to me. I'm pretty sure that is the formula for law of conservation of energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes 80.4 and 70.4 are the distances that the person travels...not the height, you will have to use the angle of inclination to find the actual height

and yes, you will encounter a lot of problems that give you distances to make your life harder
 
Well to use angle of inclination to find the height for initial, you do cosine 27.6=x/80.4 where x = 71.2 meters. The same thing with the after part. But when I plug in the height into the above equation, I still don't get it.

I'm not sure which of the three to use; cosine/tangent/sine because I don't know where the angle belongs. It says 27.6 to the horizontal so I assume the angle is at the top and you use cosine to find the adjacent given the hypotnuse of 80.4.

EDIT:
OOO I think I just got it. It's sine to get it.

Sine 27.6=x/80.4 where x=37.25
Sine 20.7=x/70.4 where x=24.77

Sub it in the above equation and I get 15.6 m/s.

Thanks for telling me about height/distance :)
 
Last edited:
draw a triangle with a right angle, the distance is the hypotenuse and the angle of inclination is opposite the height

this might be a good way to remember it ;)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top