Learning DEs: Solving 2nd Order Differential Equations

AI Thread Summary
To solve the second-order differential equation derived from Newton's second law, x'' = F/m, one can integrate the equation twice to obtain the equation of motion. The first integration gives the velocity function, and the second integration leads to the position function, x(t). This approach simplifies the process compared to more complex methods often found in textbooks. The discussion highlights that the initial confusion stemmed from the focus on homogeneous equations rather than applying basic integration techniques. Ultimately, integrating twice provides a straightforward solution to the problem.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Hi guys,

I have just started studying DEs on my own, so pardonne moi in advance for the probably silly question :)

Via Newton's second law of motion:
$$x''=\frac{F}{m} \ [1]$$
Which is a second-order differential equation.
But, from here, how do I get the good old equation of motion:
$$x(t)=\frac{F}{2m}t^2+vt+x$$
by solving the DE? What is the procedure to apply? In my textbook, only second-order homogeneous DE are treated, but nothing with the form of ##[1]##... and online everything looks over-complicated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I managed to get to the solution just by integrating twice both sides.
I was wrapping my head for nothing!
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top