I Lecture notes on SUSY using finite matrix as example?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lecture notes Susy
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
TL;DR Summary
Eigen(AA^+)=Eigen(A^+A)
As you know, a lot of SUSY examples, particularly from Witten's "SUSY QM", pivot on the factorisation trick: produce two hamiltonians $$H_0=AA^+, H_1=A^+A$$ and see they have the same eigenvalues except for ceros.

The proof usually goes by: let ##\Psi## be an eigenvector of ##H_0##, consider ##|A^+\Psi \rangle ##, then $$H_1 |A^+\Psi \rangle =A^+AA^+\Psi=A^+H_0\Psi=A^+\lambda\Psi=\lambda|A^+\Psi \rangle$$
Now this can be already seen if A a 2x3 matrix, and I think that I have sometimes this example as an starting point but just now I can not locate it, do any of you remember perhaps a blog entry or, better, any set of lecture notes doing this? With finite matrices, I mean.

I got the idea of searching simultaneously for "susy lectures" and "Cholesky factorisation" but no results.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe try SUSY transformation and Cholesky factorization.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
In LQG and LQC there are solutions called "black to white transition". I'll add some references: (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07251 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.03872 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06330 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04264 (Rovelli)https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12823 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02691 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07589 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.01788 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03027...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top