Left and right-handed Weyl spinors

  • Thread starter Thread starter goronx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spinors Weyl
goronx
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new on this forum.

I have a doubt regarding helicity and Weyl spinors: I can't understand when I have to use left or right-handed Weyl spinors in order to describe particles or antiparticles.

What i have understood is that a charged current is described by left-handed Weyl fields: in this case a particle has helicity h=-1/2 and an antiparticle has h=+1/2.
On the contrary a neutral current is a mix of left-handed and right-handed Weyl fields, so that I can't say anything about particle's and antiparticle's helicity, isn'it?

I have also a kind of homework, but I'll post it in the appropriate section of the forum. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can try to be more explicit: my problem is that I don't understand how Weyl field can be used to describe particles and antiparticles and obtain information about their helicity.
Theoretically is it clear what a Weyl field is but I can't see how they are used in practice.
 
No one?
 
There is a discussion of this in Srednicki's text, I believe in the chapter about anomalies.
 
Thanks, it's seems to be useful for my purpose.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top