- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Matej Bresar's book, "Introduction to Noncommutative Algebra" and am currently focussed on Chapter 1: Finite Dimensional Division Algebras ... ...
I need help with the proof of Lemma 1.25 ...
Lemma 1.25 reads as follows:View attachment 6261
View attachment 6262
My questions on the proof of Lemma 1.25 are as follows:Question 1
In the above text from Bresar we read the following:
" ... ... Therefore \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why Bresar is concluding that \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2\) ... ... ?Question 2
In the above text from Bresar we read the following:
" ... ... Therefore \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\)
and so \(\displaystyle M(A) = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\). ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ... ...
... implies that ... \(\displaystyle M(A) = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ...
Hope someone can help ...
Peter
===========================================================*** NOTE ***
So that readers of the above post will be able to understand the context and notation of the post ... I am providing Bresar's first two pages on Multiplication Algebras ... ... as follows:View attachment 6263
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6264
I need help with the proof of Lemma 1.25 ...
Lemma 1.25 reads as follows:View attachment 6261
View attachment 6262
My questions on the proof of Lemma 1.25 are as follows:Question 1
In the above text from Bresar we read the following:
" ... ... Therefore \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why Bresar is concluding that \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2\) ... ... ?Question 2
In the above text from Bresar we read the following:
" ... ... Therefore \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\)
and so \(\displaystyle M(A) = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\). ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why \(\displaystyle [ M(A) \ : \ F ] \gt d^2 = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ... ...
... implies that ... \(\displaystyle M(A) = [ \text{ End}_F (A) \ : \ F ]\) ...
Hope someone can help ...
Peter
===========================================================*** NOTE ***
So that readers of the above post will be able to understand the context and notation of the post ... I am providing Bresar's first two pages on Multiplication Algebras ... ... as follows:View attachment 6263
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6264
Last edited: