A Leibniz Rule Videos on Digital-University

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bamajon1974
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Videos on Leibniz differentiation of integrals from digital-university.org are available on YouTube, but the audio quality is poor and the speaker's pace is slow. Despite the clarity of explanations, one video in the series, specifically "Differentiation Of Integrals: Leibniz Rule - Part 2," is missing from both YouTube and the Internet Archive. An extensive search yielded no results for this missing video. The discussion seeks assistance in locating a saved copy or recommendations for forums or websites that could help. The inquiry highlights the challenge of accessing specific educational content online.
bamajon1974
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
Good morning

I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive.

https://web.archive.org/web/20211031012604/http://www.digital-university.org/free-calculus-videos

If you go down to the bottom of the page:

Differentiation Of Integrals: Leibniz Rule - Part 2



This video is missing, both on YouTube and Internet Archive. Extensive Google search found nothing. Just a shot in the dark but would anyone out there have saved this video they could please share? Or direct me to an appropriate subreddit/forum/website where I could get help?

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top