Length of curve in Polar coordinate system

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the length of a curve in the polar coordinate system, the correct formula involves integrating the expression s = ∫√((dr/dθ)² + r²)dθ, rather than simply ∫r(a)da. This formula accounts for both the change in radial position (dr) and the arc length due to the angular change (rdθ). The Pythagorean theorem is applied to derive the proper infinitesimal length segment (ds). In the specific case of a circle, where r is constant, the formula simplifies to s = ∫rdθ. Understanding these components is essential for accurate calculations in polar coordinates.
ltd5241
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I want to caculate length of curve in Polar coordinate system like this: if r=r(a)
then length of the curve is ∫r(a)da Is this right? if not ,why ?
What's the right one ?
I konw the way in rectangular coordinate system,I just want to do it in Polar coordinate system .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can think of it like an infinitesimal form of the Euclidean distance formula. For a function f(t)=\langle x_1(t),x_2(t),x_3(t),\ldots\rangle

\sum_a^b \sqrt { \Delta x_1^2 + \Delta x_2^2+\Delta x_3^2+\ldots } \longrightarrow s=\int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { dx_1^2 + dx_2^2+dx_3^2+\ldots} = \int_{a}^{b} \sqrt { \left(\frac{dx_1}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dx_2}{dt}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dx_3}{dt}\right)^2+\ldots}\text{ } dt
 
Is this ∫r(a)da wrong? Why?
 
You need to know what the appropriate infinitesemal length segments are!

Now, if you do polar coordinates, you may decompose a stretch of a curve into two parts:
1. The change in the radial position from the initial point on the curve to the final point.
Infinitesemally, this has length dr.

2. Here's the tricky part: The tiny arc by which the curve segment can be approximated by a circular arc, supported by a tiny angular change between the first point and the final point on the curve.
Clearly, that circular arc lies AT a radius of the value "r", and setting the angular change as d\theta[/tex], we get the expression rd\theta[/tex] for that length segment.<br /> <br /> 3. Now, we apply the Pythogorean theorem to these two length segment to gain the proper curve segment ds:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(dr)^{2}+(rd\theta)^{2}}<br /> <br /> 4. Assuming that the radial position of the point of the curve is describable as a function of the angular variable, we may rewrite this as:<br /> ds=\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 5. This is then the proper infinitesemal form of the lengthn segment, and the length s of the curve can then be calculated as:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}\sqrt{(\frac{dr}{d\theta})^{2}+r^{2}}d\theta<br /> <br /> 6. Note that in the case of a CIRCLE, where r is a constant function of the angle, this reduces to:<br /> s=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{1}}rd\theta<br /> as it should do.
 
Thank you ! Especially you,Arildno.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top