Lightlike geodesic in AdS5xS5, plane wave background

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of a lightlike particle in the AdS5×S5 metric and how it perceives the metric as a plane wave background. The transformation of coordinates is crucial for analyzing the metric in the limit as R approaches infinity, leading to a specific form of the metric. Participants explore the expansion of terms related to cosh and cos, aiming to clarify the appearance of mixed terms in the resulting equations. The confusion arises from the need to account for terms that vanish in the limit, emphasizing the importance of accurately expressing variables in terms of the new coordinates. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the subtleties involved in deriving the correct metric representation.
physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



My question is about a step in the lecture notes [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307101] on page 6, and it is probably quite trivial:

I want to see why a lightlike particle in AdS_5\times S^5 sees the metric as plane wave background. The metric is
ds^2=R^2(-dt^2 \cosh^2\rho+d\rho^2+\sinh^2\rho \,d\Omega_3^2+d\psi^2\cos^2\theta+d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,\Omega_3'^2)

In order to study the metric close to a lightlike geodesic we make the follwoing change of coordinates:
{x}^+=\frac{1}{2\mu}(t+\psi), {x}^-=\frac{\mu R^2}{2}(t-\psi), \rho=\frac{r}{R}, \theta=\frac{y}{R}

I am supposed to get in the R\to\infty limit
ds^2=R^2(-\mu^2(dx^+)^2+\mu^2(dx^+)^2)+(-2dx^+dx^--\mu^2r^2(dx^+)^2+dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2 -2dx^+dx^--\mu^2y^2(dx^+)^2+dy^2+y^2d\Omega'{}_3^2)+\mathcal{O}(R^{-2})

This is not the final result, but from there on I know how to continue.

Homework Equations



\cosh x=1+\frac{1}{2}x^2+\mathcal{O}(x^4), \cos x=1-\frac{1}{2}x^2+\mathcal{O}(x^4)
\Rightarrow \cosh^2 x = 1+x^2+\mathcal{O}(x^4), \cosh^2 x = 1-x^2+\mathcal{O}(x^4)

The Attempt at a Solution



I can expand in \rho, \theta, since they will be small in the R \to \infty limit:
ds^2=R^2(-dt^2 \cosh^2\rho+d\rho^2+\sinh^2\rho \,d\Omega_3^2+d\psi^2\cos^2\theta+d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,\Omega'{}_3^2)
=R^2(-dt^2(1+\rho^2)+d\rho^2+\rho^2d\Omega_3^2+d\psi^2(1-\theta^2)+d\theta^2+\theta^2d\Omega'{}_3^2)+\mathcal{O}(R^{-2})
=R^2(-dt^2+d\psi^2)+(-dt^2r^2+dr^2+r^2d\Omega_3^2-d\psi^2y^2+dy^2+y^2d\Omega'{}_3^2=+\mathcal{O}(R^{-2})

Now I use:
dx^+dx^-=\frac{1}{2\mu}(dt+d\psi)\frac{\mu R^2}{2}(dt-d\psi)=\frac{R^2}{4}(dt^2-d\psi^2)
So the first term above is R^2(-dt^2+d\psi^2)=-4dx^+dx^-.

However, I do not know where all the (dx^+)^2 in the solution are coming from, since
(dx^+)^2=\frac{1}{4\mu^2}(dt^2+2dt\,d\psi+d\psi^2)
Where do these mixed dt\,d\psi terms come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They come from quadratic terms in the expansion of cos and cosh that are finite in the scaling limit.
 
Thank you, but could you be a bit more precise, please. From comparing the given result and what I got so far I should be able to show:
-dt^2r^2-d\psi^2y^2=R^2(-\mu^2(dx^+)^2+\mu^2(dx^+)^2)-\mu^2r^2(dx^+)^2-\mu^2y^2(dx^+)^2
The left hand sinde are those quadratic terms from the expansion of \cos and \cosh. Since the first part of the right hand side is 0 anyways, I don't mind to much that I don't get that one, but I still don't see the equality:
-\mu^2r^2(dx^+)^2-\mu^2y^2(dx^+)^2=-\frac{r^2+y^2}{4}(dt^2+2dt\,d\psi+d\psi^2)
Why is this equal to -r^2dt^2-y^2d\psi^2?
 
physicus said:
Thank you, but could you be a bit more precise, please. From comparing the given result and what I got so far I should be able to show:
-dt^2r^2-d\psi^2y^2=R^2(-\mu^2(dx^+)^2+\mu^2(dx^+)^2)-\mu^2r^2(dx^+)^2-\mu^2y^2(dx^+)^2
The left hand sinde are those quadratic terms from the expansion of \cos and \cosh. Since the first part of the right hand side is 0 anyways, I don't mind to much that I don't get that one, but I still don't see the equality:
-\mu^2r^2(dx^+)^2-\mu^2y^2(dx^+)^2=-\frac{r^2+y^2}{4}(dt^2+2dt\,d\psi+d\psi^2)
Why is this equal to -r^2dt^2-y^2d\psi^2?

You are making the mistake of working backwards from the answer, when there are terms that get dropped in the limit. You can't obtain these original terms from just the finite part, hence your confusion. Express ##t,\psi## in terms of ##x^\pm## and just write down what

$$-dt^2r^2-d\psi^2y^2$$

works out to be.
 
Perfect, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
822
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
911