Limit Calculation for Block Sliding on Lubricated Surface with Quadratic Drag

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jukai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
A block sliding on a lubricated surface experiences viscous resistance proportional to the speed raised to the 3/2 power. The problem requires demonstrating that the block cannot travel further than 2m(Vo^(1/2))/c, where c is the drag constant. Initial attempts to integrate the motion equations led to incorrect limits due to sign errors and missing factors. Correcting these mistakes, particularly the treatment of the viscous force and integration constants, reveals that the limit approaches the desired result. The final solution confirms the block's maximum travel distance under the given conditions.
Jukai
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m slides on a horizontal surface that's been lubricated with a heavy oil so that the block suffers a viscous resistance that varies as the 3/2 power of the speed.

If the initial speed of the block is Vo at x=o, show that the block cannot travel further than 2m(Vo^(1/2))/c

c is the drag constant.

Homework Equations



The viscous resistance is defined as F(v)=-cv^(3/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So I defined my axis so that F = ma = -F(v) = cv^(3/2)

It's obvious that I need to calculate the limit of t when t goes to infinity from the position equation. So I integrate my F=ma equation twice and I don't get the answer.

For my first integration, I have dv/(v^(3/2)) = (cm)dt which gets me 1/(V^(1/2)) - 1/(Vo^(1/2)) = cmt

Now I isolate V=dx/dt in order to integrate a second time. I find that V=1/((Vo^(1/2)) + (ct/2m))^2

Let u = the denominator, du = cdt/2m --> dt = 2mdu/c. The integral becomes dx=1/(u)^2du
and I get x = -1/u. After I replace u for it's value, my limit when t-->infinity isn't what the question demands.

Could someone tell me where I might have made a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jukai said:

Homework Equations



The viscous resistance is defined as F(v)=-cv^(3/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



So I defined my axis so that F = ma = -F(v) = cv^(3/2)

It's obvious that I need to calculate the limit of t when t goes to infinity from the position equation. So I integrate my F=ma equation twice and I don't get the answer.

For my first integration, I have dv/(v^(3/2)) = (cm)dt which gets me 1/(V^(1/2)) - 1/(Vo^(1/2)) = cmt

The viscous force acts opposite to the direction of motion. It was already defined with the correct sign, but you negated it. If you take your solution and replace c -> -c you might get the correct result.
 
fzero said:
The viscous force acts opposite to the direction of motion. It was already defined with the correct sign, but you negated it. If you take your solution and replace c -> -c you might get the correct result.

I just tried it, and my limit is still wrong. My second integral is now x = m/c((1/Vo^(1/2)) - (ct/m))
 
You're missing some minus signs and factors of 2. You're also missing the t=0 term in the integration of the velocity. For the first integration I find

-\frac{2}{\sqrt{v}} + \frac{2}{\sqrt{v_0}} = - \frac{ct}{m}

The 2nd integration gives

x = \frac{2m v_0 }{c\sqrt{v_0}} \left( - \frac{1}{1+\frac{c\sqrt{v_0}}{2m}t} + 1\right).

After simplifying, you get something that yields

x(t\rightarrow\infty) \rightarrow \frac{2m\sqrt{v_0}}{c}.
 
thank you very much, I understand now
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top