Limiting radius ratio for tetrahedral

  • Thread starter Thread starter tanaygupta2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the limiting radius ratio for tetrahedral structures, specifically for coordination number 4, which is established between 0.225 and 0.414. The user successfully demonstrated the lower limit of 0.225 but seeks assistance in proving the upper limit of 0.414. It is noted that each coordination number has a minimum radius ratio, and larger ratios can be inferred from diagrams illustrating these relationships. The maximum radius ratio for a given coordination number is determined by the minimum radius ratio of the next higher coordination number. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on these mathematical relationships to complete the proof.
tanaygupta2000
Messages
208
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Prove that the tetrahedral structure (like ZnS) having a coordination number of 4 have a limiting radius ratio in the range 0.225-0.414
Relevant Equations
Pythagoras Theorem, d^2 = a^2 + a^2
I am able to prove that it is 0.225 but how do I prove that it is also 0.414?
I need to find the max. and min. packing fraction values, which I got as a function of (r1/r2)
Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tanaygupta2000 said:
Homework Statement:: Prove that the tetrahedral structure (like ZnS) having a coordination number of 4 have a limiting radius ratio in the range 0.225-0.414
Relevant Equations:: Pythagoras Theorem, d^2 = a^2 + a^2

I am able to prove that it is 0.225 but how do I prove that it is also 0.414?
I need to find the max. and min. packing fraction values, which I got as a function of (r1/r2)
Please help
I’m definitely no expert but maybe this will help...

Each coordination number has a minimum value of the radius ratio (RR). Larger values of the RR are possible - you can get the general idea from this diagram. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Criticalradiusratio.png/800px-Criticalradiusratio.png

For a given coordination number, the maximum value of the RR is taken as the minimum value of the RR of the next coordination number. (I’m no expert so please don’t ask me why!)

What is the next possible coordination number after 4?
What is the minimum value of its RR?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top