MHB Linearization of this equation / Inverse function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the inverse function of the equation y = a * (exp(-b * x) + c * (1 - exp(-b * x))). Initially, the user struggled with online tools that failed to provide a workable inverse function. After some attempts, the correct inverse function was derived as f^{-1}(x) = (1/b) * ln((a(1-c))/(x-ac)). The user clarified that the constant 'a' also affects the equation, leading to different results in their calculations. Ultimately, the problem was solved, confirming the feasibility of deriving the inverse function.
guiismiti
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I need to find the inverse function of the following equation

Code:
y = a * ((exp(-b * x)) + (c * (1 - (exp(-b * x)))))

Where a, b and c are constants.

I have experimental points that fit to this equation and I want to use these values in the inverse funtion to linearize it.

I have tried to use a few tools available online, but the output functions did not work, which made me think if it is actually possible to do it.Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance.

Edited: solved
Code:
x = (1 / (-b)) * (LN(((a * c) - y) / (a * (c - 1))))
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)=(a-c)e^{-bx}+c$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=(a-c)e^{-by}+c$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-c=(a-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-c}{a-c}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-c}{a-c}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
We are given:

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)=(a-c)e^{-bx}+c$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=(a-c)e^{-by}+c$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-c=(a-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-c}{a-c}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-c}{a-c}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

The constant 'a' also multiplies the second term, that's why we got different results.

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+ac\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)$$
 
guiismiti said:
The constant 'a' also multiplies the second term, that's why we got different results.

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+ac\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)$$

So it does...I missed that...lemme try again:


We are given:

$$f(x)=a\left(e^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)\right)=a(1-c)e^{-bx}+ac$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=a(1-c)e^{-by}+ac$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-ac=a(1-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-ac}{a(1-c)}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-ac}{a(1-c)}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a(1-c)}{x-ac}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a(1-c)}{x-ac}\right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
So it does...I missed that...lemme try again

Done :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top