Liquid pressure in microgravity

AI Thread Summary
In microgravity, the formula p = ρgh suggests that pressure approaches zero as gravitational acceleration (g) approaches zero. However, the discussion highlights that molecular movement in the liquid still causes collisions with the jar's sides, potentially creating pressure. It is noted that the formula is more accurate for determining relative pressure changes rather than absolute pressure. The equation could be adjusted to p = p₀ + ρgh, where p₀ represents the initial pressure, to account for this. Overall, while pressure may be negligible in microgravity, it is not entirely absent due to molecular activity.
2147483647
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is more of a conceptual question rather than a homework problem. This is my first post, so apologies if this is in the wrong section.

Consider a jar full of liquid in microgravity.

My book says:
According to the formula p = ρgh, p→0 as g→0. Thus there is no pressure in the jar when it's in microgravity.

My problem:
Isn't it true, though, that the molecules in the liquid are jiggling around? Wouldn't these molecules still inadvertently bump into the sides of the jar, creating pressure?

Homework Equations



p = ρgh

The Attempt at a Solution



My current thought is that the pressure due to this bumping is negligible. So the formula p = ρgh is a (good) approximation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my opinion. "the formula p = ρgh" is generally used in determining the pressure of liquids at a given depth, h, in a container on the Earth.
I would think that in no gravity, like in space, there will always be some pressure due to the vapor of the liquid. If you had a gas in space, then of course there would be pressure.
 
Barryj is correct. In addition, the equation p=ρgh is not really correct. It should not be used to determine the absolute pressure. The equation should really read Δp=ρgΔz, or, even better dp = ρg dz. The equation gives the relative change in pressure with distance in the direction of the gravitational vector, rather than giving the absolute pressure.
 
Brilliant, thank you barryj and Chestermiller.

Would it be appropriate to suggest p = p_{0} + \rho gh, where p_{0} is the initial pressure? So, as you were saying Chestermiller, p = \rho gh would be the change in pressure.
 
2147483647 said:
Brilliant, thank you barryj and Chestermiller.

Would it be appropriate to suggest p = p_{0} + \rho gh, where p_{0} is the initial pressure? So, as you were saying Chestermiller, p = \rho gh would be the change in pressure.

Yes, with spatial position in a gravitational field.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top