MHB Logarithmic Integral on Stack Exchange - author unknown

AI Thread Summary
An alternative solution to the integral $$\int_0^1\frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{(1+x)}\,dx$$ is presented, utilizing a generalized parametric case $$\mathcal{I}(z)$$. The solution involves substitutions and integration by parts, leading to a closed form that includes logarithmic and polylogarithmic functions. The discussion highlights the complexity of higher-order integrals of similar forms, which can be approached using comparable methods. Participants express interest in further developments on logarithmic integrals and the potential for more intricate solutions. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical intricacies involved in evaluating these types of integrals.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the generalized parametric case where $$0 < z \le 1$$:$$\mathcal{I}(z)=\int_0^z\frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{(1+x)}\,dx$$Substitute $$y=1+x$$ to obtain:$$\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log[1-(y-1)]}{y}\,dy=\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log(2-y)}{y}\,dy=$$$$\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left[2 \left(1-\frac{y}{2} \right) \right]}{y}\,dy=$$$$\log 2\, \int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y}{y}\,dy+\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy$$Performing an integration by parts on that first integral gives:$$\frac{1}{2}\log 2\, (\log y)^2\, \Bigg|_1^{1+z}=\frac{1}{2}\log 2\log^2(1+z)$$So$$\mathcal{I}(z)=\frac{1}{2}\log 2\log^2(1+z)+\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy$$Next, we split that last integral into two:$$\int_1^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy=
\int_0^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy-\int_0^1\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy$$For $$0 < z \le 1$$, Polylogarithms of order $$m \ge 1$$ have the integral representation:$$\text{Li}_m(z)=\frac{(-1)^{m-1}}{(m-2)!}\int_0^1\frac{(\log x)^{m-2}\log(1-zx)}{x}\,dx$$Hence$$\int_0^1\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy=\text{Li}_3\left( \tfrac{1}{2}\right) $$So$$\mathcal{I}(z)=\frac{1}{2}\log 2\log^2(1+z)-\text{Li}_3\left( \tfrac{1}{2}\right) +\int_0^{1+z}\frac{\log y\log\left( 1- \frac{y}{2} \right)}{y}\,dy$$For that final integral, apply the substitution $$y=(1+z)\, x$$ to change it into:$$\int_0^1\frac{\log[(1+z)\, x]\, \log\left(1-\frac{(1+z)}{2}\, x \right)}{x}\,dx=$$$$\log(1+z)\, \int_0^1\frac{\log\left(1-\frac{(1+z)}{2}\, x \right)}{x}\,dx+\int_0^1\frac{\log x\, \log\left(1-\frac{(1+z)}{2}\, x \right)}{x}\,dx$$By the integral representation for arbitrary (non-zero) order Polylogs given above, this equates to:$$-\log(1+z) \, \text{Li}_2\left(\frac{1+z}{2}\right)+ \text{Li}_3 \left(\frac{1+z}{2}\right)$$
------------------------------
General parametric solution:

$$\int_0^z\frac{\log(1+x)\log(1-x)}{(1+x)}\,dx=$$$$\frac{1}{2}\log 2\log^2(1+z)-\text{Li}_3\left( \tfrac{1}{2}\right) - \log(1+z) \, \text{Li}_2\left(\frac{1+z}{2}\right)+ \text{Li}_3 \left(\frac{1+z}{2}\right)$$For $$\, \, 0 < z \le 1$$
 
Nice solution . I always consider differentiating the hypergeometric function to be an alternative solution even though not easy .
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Nice solution . I always consider differentiating the hypergeometric function to be an alternative solution even though not easy .
Thanks Zaid! (Sun)

It can get a bit - erm - 'hairy' when your dealing with higher order integrals of the type above, but all integrals of the form $$\int_0^z\frac{\log^m(1+x)\log(1-x)}{(1+x)},dx$$and $$\int_0^z\frac{\log^m(1-x)\log(1+x)}{(1-x)},dx$$can be done in the same way. The closed form involves some pretty annoying (finite!) double sums (possibly a triple sum too)... I'll add this onto the Logarithmic Integrals thread at some point (soon). It's been "in the post" for a while... ;)
 
Last edited:
That seems interesting , I'll be waiting to see that .
 
DreamWeaver said:
Thanks Zaid! (Sun)

It can get a bit - erm - 'hairy' when your dealing with higher order integrals of the type above, but all integrals of the form $$\int_0^z\frac{\log^m(1+x)\log(1-x)}{(1+x)},dx$$and $$\int_0^z\frac{\log^m(1-x)\log(1+x)}{(1-x)},dx$$can be done in the same way. The closed form involves some pretty annoying (finite!) double sums (possibly a triple sum too)... I'll add this onto the Logarithmic Integrals thread at some point (soon). It's been "in the post" for a while... ;)

ZaidAlyafey said:
That seems interesting , I'll be waiting to see that .

Hi DreamWeaver,

I see it now that you have got a fan, congrats! (Sun)And I envy you!:p
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top