B Looking for a list of astronomy collaborations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion seeks a comprehensive list of astronomy and astrophysics collaborations, including their acronyms, full names, and brief descriptions of their functions. The user has not found existing resources despite searching, suggesting a need for a centralized reference. They express a preference for leveraging existing expert knowledge rather than compiling a list independently, which could be time-consuming and incomplete. The user notes a perception that there are more collaborations in astronomy/astrophysics compared to high energy physics. The thread highlights the desire for accessible information to aid in understanding the landscape of astronomical research collaborations.
ohwilleke
Gold Member
Messages
2,650
Reaction score
1,609
TL;DR Summary
Reading preprints at arXiv I see many astronomy collaborations publish papers from time to time and was wondering if there is a good, more or less comprehensive list somewhere.
Reading preprints at arXiv I see many astronomy/astrophysics collaborations publish papers from time to time (e.g. IceCube, HESS, DESI, GAIA, ACT, GRAND).

Could someone point me to a good, more or less comprehensive, list somewhere (like a Wikipedia page that I don't know the name of, an arXiv reference page, or a directory from a university astronomy department for job hunting new graduates), that includes acronyms, spelled out names, and a sentence or two description of what each one does (e.g. "IceCube is a collaboration centered around an Antarctica based neutrino observatory.")?

My own quick searches haven't turned up this kind of list, but I could easily be trying to use the wrong kind of search terms.

Alternatively, if there aren't too many of them, and someone finds it easy enough to do, could someone make a list in a post or two on this thread?

I could probably skim preprints for dozens of hours and make a list like that myself, but there is no point in reinventing the wheel if something like that already exists and is done by someone who is more of an expert in the field than I am. In addition to the time involved, I'm more likely to miss an important collaboration that, for whatever reason, hasn't published many papers all that recently.

My intuitive sense is that there are a lot more astronomy/astrophysics collaborations out there than there are high energy physics collaborations.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
This is a Wikipedia page of astronomy acronyms listing HESS, DESI, GAIA, but not IceCube, ACT, or GRAND.

However, IceCube is also known as ICL or IC, and it is in the list.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronomy_acronyms
I added IC, ACT, GRAND, XRISM and CGM.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Back
Top