Lorentz boost to obtain parallel E and B fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the conditions for a Lorentz transformation that aligns electric field \vec{E} and magnetic field \vec{B} in a new inertial frame. The participant explores the effects of a Lorentz boost along different directions, noting that when the boost is parallel to \vec{E} and \vec{B}, the fields remain unchanged. They also consider the case of a perpendicular boost, which leads to a transformation that can produce an angle between \vec{E} and \vec{B}. The concept of invariants is introduced, specifically referencing the scalar quantity derived from the electromagnetic field tensor, which indicates that if \vec{E} is parallel to \vec{B} in one frame, this relationship holds in all frames. The participant concludes that finding the appropriate Lorentz boost is key to solving the problem.
Xavier1900
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose given an electric field \vec{E} and a magnetic field \vec{B} in some inertial frame. Determine the conditions under which there exists a Lorentz transformation to another inertial frame in which \vec{E} || \vec{B}

Homework Equations


If we give a Lorentz boost along x_1-direction, then in the boosted frame, electric and magnetic fields are given by
E_1&#039; = E_1\\<br /> E_2&#039; = \gamma (E_2 - \beta B_3)\\<br /> E_3&#039; = \gamma (E_3 + \beta B_2)
And similar for components of B fields.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with a frame in which the fields are parallel and see what kind of fields I can obtain after the transformation. The case where the boost is along the direction of E//B fields is trivial. Then I consider the case where I boost in the direction perpendicular to the E//B fields. By the equations I listed I find that I can produce E and B fields with some angle depending on \beta. But I am not seeing how I can go further from here. Am I in the right direction? Or should I try some other approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to approach problems like these is to construct invariants - i.e quantities that are the same in all frames. For example, given a four-vector A, the quantity A^\mu A_\mu has the same value in all frames. It turns out there are two invariants that can be constructed from the electromagnetic field tensor F^{\mu \nu}, and hence from E and B. Try to discover what these are - this will help answer the question.
 
phyzguy said:
One way to approach problems like these is to construct invariants - i.e quantities that are the same in all frames. For example, given a four-vector A, the quantity A^\mu A_\mu has the same value in all frames. It turns out there are two invariants that can be constructed from the electromagnetic field tensor F^{\mu \nu}, and hence from E and B. Try to discover what these are - this will help answer the question.

Thanks for the hint. I realize that F_{\rho \sigma}\tilde{F}^{\rho\sigma} = -4 \vec{B}\cdot \vec{E}, which is a scalar. That means if E//B in one frame, \vec{E}\cdot \vec{B} \neq 0 in all frames. Thus I just need to find the right Lorentz boost for systems like that. I will try and see what I can find.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top