Lorentz transformation conclusion with rotation of axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the Lorentz transformations as presented in Landau's "The Classical Theory of Fields." A key point is the transformation of the hyperbolic tangent function, tanh(ψ) = V/c, into its components, sinh(ψ) and cosh(ψ), with the introduction of the gamma factor, γ = 1/sqrt(1-V^2/c^2). Participants seek clarification on the mathematical justification for this transformation and whether constants can be arbitrarily added. The conversation emphasizes the geometric interpretation of these transformations using Minkowski space and the Pythagorean theorem. Understanding this method is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of relativity.
TheDestroyer
Messages
401
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I've attached 2 pages from the book of landau "The Classical Theory of fields", I have a question about the lorentz transformations in pages 10,11

after reaching the step:

tanh(psy)= V/c

How did he split the latter into sinh(psy) and cosh(psy) and added the "gamma" constant which is 1/sqrt(1-V^2/c^2) ?

Can we add any constant we want? of course there is a reason

anyone can explain?

I know the Einsteins way of concluding these transformations but I want to understand the rotation of axes method

thanks in advance, please reply as soon as possible :)
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 477
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 467
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about a [Minkowski-] right-triangle... and its associated Pythagorean theorem [the square-interval]:

write:
\cosh^2 \psi - \sinh^2\psi = 1
as:
\cosh^2 \psi(1 - \tanh^2\psi) = 1
 
Last edited:
Thanks
:approve:
 
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Back
Top