- #1
captain
- 164
- 0
i am confused what a lorentz transformation really is or is it just a transformation described by the boost transformation.
A Lorentz transformation establishes a relationship between the space-time coordinates of the sameevent detected from two inertial reference frames in relative motion and in the standard arrangement and with well defined initial conditions. The two events (E(x,y,z,t) and E'(x',y',z',t') take place at the same point in space when the synchronized clocks (a la Einstein) of the two inertial frames, located at that point, read t and t'.captain said:i am confused what a lorentz transformation really is or is it just a transformation described by the boost transformation.
[emphasis(underlined) mine]bernhard.rothenstein said:A Lorentz transformation establishes a relationship between the space-time coordinates of the sameevent detected from two inertial reference frames in relative motion and in the standard arrangement and with well defined initial conditions.
neutrino said:[emphasis(underlined) mine]
Is that a necessary condition? (By "standard arrangement" I assume you are referring to the standard configuration of inertial coordinate systems.)
bernhard.rothenstein said:I assume the same thing as you do. Parallel axes, overlapped OX(O'X') axes, motion of I' relative to I in the positive direction of the overlapped axes, coincidence of the origins at the origin of time. I am not very familiar with the standard English terms.
Thanks for your question and help
bernhard.rothenstein said:A Lorentz transformation establishes a relationship between the space-time coordinates of the sameevent detected from two inertial reference frames in relative motion and in the standard arrangement and with well defined initial conditions.
The way in which you present the LT, they hold in the case when the I' frame where the event involved in the transformation is E'(x',y',t') moves with speed v in the positive direction of the overlapped OX(O'X') axes relative to the I frame where the same event is E(x,y,t) in a two space dimensions approach. You can easy test the condition x'=0 for t=0 and x=0. You can add y=y'=0. That is the scenario that leads to the simplest shaped LT. Further questions?neutrino said:But you still haven't answered my question.
Is it necessary for the relative motion be along the x-axes (y- and z-axes parallel) and the origins to coincide at t = t' =0 for the transformations to be valid?
I ask this because the OP didn't specifically mention
[tex]x' = \gamma\left(x - \beta ct)[/tex]
[tex]ct' = \gamma\left(ct - \beta x)[/tex]
(or its inverse).
Lorentz Transformation is a mathematical concept that describes how space and time coordinates change between two reference frames that are moving relative to each other at constant velocity. It was first introduced by Hendrik Lorentz in the late 19th century and later refined by Albert Einstein in his theory of special relativity.
Lorentz Transformation is important because it helps us understand the effects of motion on space and time. It is a fundamental concept in the theory of special relativity and has many practical applications in modern physics, such as in the study of particle accelerators and the behavior of objects at high speeds.
Lorentz Transformation is the mathematical framework that explains time dilation and length contraction, which are two of the key principles of special relativity. Time dilation refers to the phenomenon where time appears to pass slower for an observer moving at high speeds, while length contraction describes how objects appear shorter in the direction of motion for an observer in a different reference frame.
Yes, Lorentz Transformation can be visualized using spacetime diagrams or graphs. These diagrams help to illustrate the relationships between space and time coordinates for two reference frames and how they change as their relative velocity changes.
Lorentz Transformation is based on the assumption of constant velocity and therefore does not apply to non-inertial reference frames, such as those undergoing acceleration. It also does not account for the effects of gravity, which are described by the theory of general relativity.