I Lorentz Transformation in One-Dimensional Space

the_emi_guy
Messages
766
Reaction score
79
If space only had one dimension would Einstein's speed of light postulate still lead to Lorentz transformation for motion along that one dimension?
Relativity of simultaneity can obviously be demonstrated in one dimension (lightning bolts hitting opposite ends of stationary and moving train). But all derivations of the Lorentz transformation seem to require at least a second space dimension (i.e. the familiar light clock and Einsteins original 1905 paper) in order to obtain the Lorentz factor. Also, description of light cone:
c2dt2=dx2+dy2+dz2 reduces to
cdt=dx so space-time intervals would no longer have the square roots of squares involved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the_emi_guy said:
But all derivations of the Lorentz transformation seem to require at least a second space dimension
It's easy to do a one-dimensional derivation; there's one by Einstein in the appendix of his book "Relativity: The special and general theory".

Basically we're looking for coordinate transformations such that ##x\pm{c}t=0## implies ##x'\pm{c}t'=0##, which is to say the speed of light is ##c## in both frames.
 
the_emi_guy said:
Also, description of light cone:
c2dt2=dx2+dy2+dz2 reduces to
cdt=dx so space-time intervals would no longer have the square roots of squares involved.
Yes it would. You are missing one root by asserting c dt = dx.
 
Thanks, this is what I was looking for.
 
Nugatory said:
It's easy to do a one-dimensional derivation; there's one by Einstein in the appendix of his book "Relativity: The special and general theory".

Basically we're looking for coordinate transformations such that ##x\pm{c}t=0## implies ##x'\pm{c}t'=0##, which is to say the speed of light is ##c## in both frames.
Then you are let even to a larger group of transformations, namely the whole conformel group!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top