Lorentz Transformation Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a second particle in a laboratory frame using the Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation. One particle moves at 0.650c, while the relative speed between the two particles is 0.950c. The initial calculation yields a speed of 0.784c, but confusion arises over the sign conventions used in the formula. Participants suggest that the discrepancy may stem from different conventions or a potential typo in the provided solution. Ultimately, the focus remains on the correct application of the transformation equation to determine the speed accurately.
phisci
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 particles are created in a high-energy accelerator and move off in opposite directions. The speed of one particle, as measured in the laboratory is 0.650c, and the speed of each particle relative to the other is 0.950c. What is the speed of the second particle, as measured in the laboratory.


Homework Equations


Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation.

Vx= Vx'+u/(1+(uVx'/C2))


The Attempt at a Solution


I let S be the frame of reference of the laboratory and S, be the frame of reference of the first particle.

From the question, u=+0.650c and the velocity of the 2nd particle in the S' frame is
Vx'= -0.950c since it is approaching the first particle.

Hence when i plug in the values into the formula, I should get

Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(-0.950x0.650)) = -0.784c

the speed is hence 0.784c.

However the solution given puts a negative sign to the 0.650 in the denominator. i.e.
Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(0.950x-0.650))

Why did they negate the 0.650 and not the 0.950? Where have i gone wrong in my reasoning? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just a typo. Your solution is fine.
 
You can also use (0.950-0.650)c/1-0.650*0.950) = 0.784c. Since the question doesn't label one direction as positive, and only asks for speed (the magnitude of velocity), it doesn't really matter. I don't know why they chose to deploy the minus signs as they did; maybe it's a trivial difference in convention: which formula they started off with, and how they assigned the variables in this particular problem to those of the general formula etc., or maybe just a typo as vela suggests. I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it ;-)
 
Last edited:
okay noted. thanks alot! :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top