Luminosity of the Earth covered in bulbs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stendhal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total power output of 100W light bulbs covering the Earth's surface and comparing it to the Sun's luminosity. The surface area of the Earth is determined to be approximately 4.5 * 10^20 cm^2, leading to a total power output of 1.5 * 10^21 W from the bulbs. This results in a luminosity ratio of the Sun to the Earth-bulb setup of about 7 * 10^4. To match the Sun's luminosity, each bulb would need to be significantly more powerful, specifically 10,000W. The calculations were verified, correcting an initial error in surface area conversion.
Stendhal
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known ddata
a.) Assume that a 100W light bulb covers 30cm^2 of area, and covers the surface of the Earth (land and water) with such 100W bulbs. How would the total power output compare with the luminosity of the Sun? Note: L_sun = 10^26W and the radius of the Earth is 6*10^6 meters.

b.) Which wattage would each light bulb need to be to make the luminosity of the entire Earth equal to the luminosity of the Sun?

Homework Equations


Surface area = 4πr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Studying for finals and found an old test problem that I got wrong.

Initially I calculated the Surface area of the Earth
4*π*(6*10^6 m )^2 = 4.5 * 10^14 m^2 = 4.5 * 10^20 cm^2

I set the surface area of the Earth over the area of the bulb and multiplied that by the wattage of the bulb:

SA/A = (4.5*10^20 cm^2)/(30 cm^2) = 1.5 * 10^19 * 100W = 1.5 * 10^21 W

Then made a ratio of the luminosity of the Sun over the Earth-bulb:

Ls/Le = 10^26/1.5 * 10^21 ≈ 7 * 10^4 difference.

For part b, each bulb would have to be 100 times more luminous, so 100^2 W instead of just 100W.

This isn't what I did on the test, rather what I did just now. I don't quite know if this is correct, so I'm hoping someone could verify if it is or not. Thank you for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 100 cm in 1 m, so 10^14 m^2 is 10^18 cm^2, not 10^20 cm^2.
 
Ah, yes, thank you. I made a calculator error there. Does everything else seem fine to you?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top