Magnetic Field from Protons vs Electrons

AI Thread Summary
Electrons and protons moving in a magnetic field generate magnetic fields according to the right-hand rule, with the direction of the magnetic field being opposite for electrons due to their negative charge. The Biot-Savart law describes the magnetic field produced by both particles, where the magnetic field for electrons is opposite to the direction given by the velocity and radius vector cross product. For protons, the magnetic field aligns with the right-hand rule, reflecting their positive charge. The magnitude of the magnetic field produced by protons is expected to be smaller compared to the surrounding magnetic field. Understanding these principles is crucial for studying electromagnetic interactions.
General Scientist
Messages
39
Reaction score
3
If an electron is moving in a circle in a magnetic field, it produces a magnetic field in accordance to the right hand rule. If a proton is moving in a circle in a magnetic field, would it produce a magnetic field in accordance to the left hand equivalent to the right hand rule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
General Scientist said:
If an electron is moving in a circle in a magnetic field, it produces a magnetic field in accordance to the right hand rule. If a proton is moving in a circle in a magnetic field, would it produce a magnetic field in accordance to the left hand equivalent to the right hand rule.
You are correct as magnetic fields are created by moving charges, and the example would satisfy the criteria. Although, I assume it would be tiny compared to the surrounding magnetic field. The right hand rule would work for a proton.
 
The magnetic field for both is described by Biot-Savart's law. ## \vec{B}=\frac{\mu_o}{4 \pi} \frac{q \vec{v} \times\vec{r}}{|\vec{r}|^3} ##. With a negative charge on the electron, its magnetic field is opposite the direction given by ## \vec{v} \times \vec{r} ##.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Charles Link said:
The magnetic field for both is described by Biot-Savart's law. With a negative charge on the electron, its magnetic field is opposite the direction given by ## \vec{v} \times \vec{r} ##.
So the positive charge of a proton would mean the magnetic field is just ##\vec{v} \times \vec{r}##?
 
General Scientist said:
So the positive charge of a proton would mean the magnetic field is just ##\vec{v} \times \vec{r}##?
See the part I added to post 3=the formula for ## \vec{B} ##.
 
Charles Link said:
See the part I added to post 3=the formula for ## \vec{B} ##.
Ok. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Charles Link
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top