Magnetic vector potential for antiparallel currents

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic vector potential for two infinitely long wires carrying antiparallel currents, I1 = -I2, separated by distance d. The magnetic field is derived using Ampere's law, resulting in an expression that incorporates the distances r1 and r2 from each wire to a point P. The azimuthal component of the vector potential is emphasized, with the equation for the potential being derived from the difference in distances to the point. The superposition principle is suggested as a method to combine the potentials from each wire. The conversation highlights the challenge of integrating the expression with respect to the two distances involved.
teastation
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Two infinitely long wires separated by distance d. Currents: I1 = -I2. Find potential vector as a function of r1 and r2 at a point P (r1 and r2 distances to P from wire one and wire two).
Del cross A= B
B = (mu I)/(2pi r)



Using Ampere's, I get an expression for the magnetic field that involves two different distances, r1and r2. I see that integrating this expression with respect to distance will give me the vector potential. But with two distances to take into account, I don't know how to solve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh I'm using cylindrical coordinates. With the wires oriented along the z axis, the only term that survives del cross A is the azimuthal component.
-partial dA/ds = (mu I)/2pi [(1/r1) - (1/r2)] in the phi direction.
 
Hello.

Can you find an expression for A for a single infinitely long straight wire carrying current I ? If so, then the superposition principle will get you the answer fairly easily.
 
Thanks TSny. Duh... the problem asks me to get the vector as a function of two different distances. I don't need to find a way to relate them. QuiteEasilyDone
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top