Magnetostatic field: solution to Poisson's equation and Boundary Conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving boundary conditions for interfaces between ferromagnetic materials and air, specifically addressing the equations related to the continuity of magnetic fields. The user understands the derivation of the normal component of magnetic flux density (B) but struggles with the tangential component of magnetic field intensity (H) and its implications for voltage continuity. They note that their current understanding leads to a time derivative relationship rather than the required voltage equality. The request for hints indicates a need for clarification on the relationship between the magnetic fields and the voltages at the interface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately applying boundary conditions in magnetostatic field problems.
wzy75
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How to derive boundary conditions for interfaces between ferromagnetic material and air?
Please see the attached figure. Any hints will be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Magnetostatics_Poisson.PNG
    Magnetostatics_Poisson.PNG
    29.4 KB · Views: 1,511
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can see how the second equation in (7) is derived from the continuity of normal component of B, but still cannot figure out how to derive the first equation in (7), i.e.
V_{in}=V_{out}.

From the continuity of tangential component of H, I only get
\frac{\partial V_{in}}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial V_{out}}{\partial t},
which is different from
V_{in}=V_{out}.

I must have been missing something here. Could anybody give me some hints?
 

Thread 'How to picture the vector potential?'

Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Why is "method of image current" valid in magnetostatics?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Where is Laplace's Equation Valid in Different Domains?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)
Replies
3
Views
189
Poisson's equation boundary conditions (electrostatics)
Replies
2
Views
7K
Jump conditions for electric field across an interface
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Dirichlet problem boundary conditions
Replies
4
Views
2K
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
Replies
7
Views
2K
Maxwell Equations Absorbent Boundary Conditions
Replies
4
Views
1K
Electromagnetic boundary conditions for symmetric model
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Why are only TM waves allowed in this geometry? (Planar interface)
Replies
0
Views
999

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top