Manifold hypersurface foliation and Frobenius theorem

  • #71
cianfa72 said:
Sorry, I didn't get yet why the above holds true. Thanks.
You're quoting your own post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
Yes, what about my last question
Why it follows that ##f(x,-y) = - f(x,y)## ?
Is it just because ##f(\text{ },)## actually doesn't depend on its first "slot" (Since the partial derivative w.r.t. it is null) ?
 
Last edited:
  • #73
cianfa72 said:
Yes, what about my last question

Is it just because ##f(\text{ },)## actually doesn't depend on its first "slot" (Since the partial derivative w.r.t. it is null) ?
@lavinia is probably more qualified to answer, but this follows from the fact that he claimed that ##f(x+1/2, -y) = -f(x, y)## and the fact that ##\partial_x f = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72
  • #74
Just to help to visualize the mapping of the open Mobius band given by the atlas in post #31, I drew the following picture. ##(U_1,Id)## and ##(U_2,f)## are the two atlas's chart mapping. Vertical red lines's points are identified with a sign flip.

20240807_211336-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jbergman

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
602
Replies
6
Views
987
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top