Marginal cost with two variables, confused.

nakota2k
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Your weekly cost to manufacture x bicycles and y tricycles is

C(x,y)=20,000+60x+20y+50√(xy)

a. What is marginal cost of manufacturing a bicycle.

b. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a tricycle.

c. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a bicycle at a level of 10 bicycles and 10 tricycles?

d. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a tricycle at a level of 8 bicycles and 8 tricycles?





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Normally I thought I would derive then plug in for x to get marginal cost.
I derived x and got (25y^1/2)/x^(1/2) +60 but I don't know what to do next or if that is even right.

I derived y and got (25x^1/2)/(y^1/2) +20 again I don't know what to do next
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nakota2k said:

Homework Statement



Your weekly cost to manufacture x bicycles and y tricycles is

C(x,y)=20,000+60x+20y+50√(xy)

a. What is marginal cost of manufacturing a bicycle.

b. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a tricycle.

c. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a bicycle at a level of 10 bicycles and 10 tricycles?

d. What is the marginal cost of manufacturing a tricycle at a level of 8 bicycles and 8 tricycles?





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Normally I thought I would derive then plug in for x to get marginal cost.
I derived x and got (25y^1/2)/x^(1/2) +60 but I don't know what to do next or if that is even right.

I derived y and got (25x^1/2)/(y^1/2) +20 again I don't know what to do next

Yes, that is (roughly) what is meant by marginal cost.

For (a) and (b) that is all you can do, since a base pair (x,y) is not specified. However, in parts (c) and (d) you are given x and y values to work with. So, what do you think you should do next?

In principle, the true marginal cost of 1 bicycle, starting from a base of ##(x_0,y_0)##, would be
\text{actual marginal cost } = C(x_0+1,y_0) - C(x_0,y_0)
For a cost function that does not "curve" too much (or for values of ##x_0## and ##y_0## that are not "too small" we have a reasonable approximation if we take
C(x_0+1,y_0) - C(x_0,y_0) \approx \frac{\partial C(x_0,y_0)}{\partial x},
so that is why I said "roughly" before. Basically, the partial derivative is what economists often use. To be absolutely sure of your usage, check the definitions in your textbook or course notes.
 
Ok this is what I got so far.

a. 60+25√y/x

b. 20+25√x/y

c. $85

d $45
 
nakota2k said:
Ok this is what I got so far.

a. 60+25√y/x

b. 20+25√x/y

c. $85

d $45

Yes, but be careful with parentheses. Strictly speaking, √x/y means (√x)/y, but to get those numbers you must mean (correctly) √(x/y).
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top