Mass, Energy & Inertia: Impact of Trapping Energy in a Box

In summary: I didn't catch that.What's the relativistic kinetic energy? relativistic kinetic energy is the energy of a particle that is moving at a speed greater than the speed of light.
  • #1
mokeejoe5
13
0
If you trap a lot of energy in a box does the system (box plus its contents) gain inertia and become more difficult to accelerate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
So there's nothing special about mass then? its just concentrated energy in a small volume?
 
  • #4
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
 
  • #6
Dr.D said:
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
Gyroscope!
 
  • #7
mtworkowski@o said:
Gyroscope!
Well, I have to admit, that makes as much sense as the original proposition.
 
  • #8
Dr.D said:
How did you trap all that energy in the box?
grimage-jack-in-the-box.png
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #9
A.T. said:
grimage-jack-in-the-box.png
I knew you would like it. Kinetic energy raising inertia and causing the box to behave differently than if it were stationary.
 
  • #10
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
 
  • #11
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
I used to cut allot of classes. I'm sure i missed that one!
 
  • #12
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.
What does this have to do with an increase in inertia? How does it apply to energy stored in a spring?
 
  • #13
I second that question: What does this have to do with an increase in inertia?
 
  • #14
Khashishi said:
The answer is yes, but you can show this yourself, rather than take our word for it. Try a thought experiment where you have one object made out of two atoms of given mass. Calculate the kinetic energy of the atoms when you translate the whole object. Now heat up the object (give the atoms some initial and opposite kinetic energy). Now calculate the kinetic energy when you translate the whole object.

Yeah, i missed the logic on that one. But that happens sometimes.
 
  • #15
Perhaps it would be an idea to define what you mean by "inertia' in this context.
 
  • #16
I skipped a couple steps, and hoped everyone would still be able to follow. Let me elaborate some more.

The work it takes to move an object is equal to the difference in kinetic energy between the object at rest and the object in motion.
##W = T_f - T_i##
##F = dW/dx = dT/dx##
We can define a "mass" for the composite object using
##F = ma##
so
##m = \frac{dT/dx}{a}##
##m \propto \Delta T/\Delta v##

When you heat an object, the molecules gain vibrational energy. It takes more work to move a box of hot molecules than a box of cold ones. Let's simplify the composite object as much as is possible: it is composed of two atoms. When the atoms vibrate, they move in opposite directions so the total center of mass doesn't move. The kinetic energy of the object is simply the sum of the kinetic energy of the atoms, and any kinetic energy of any fields in the object (which we will assume to be zero).
Calculate the change in kinetic energy when you move the center of mass of the object. Do this for the cold object, and the hot object, and see which takes more work. The work it takes to move the object is proportional to the mass of the composite object.
 
  • #17
mtworkowski@o said:
I knew you would like it. Kinetic energy raising inertia and causing the box to behave differently than if it were stationary.
The jack in the box has potential energy (in the compressed spring), that increases inertia.
 
  • #18
Khashishi said:
Calculate the change in kinetic energy when you move the center of mass of the object. Do this for the cold object, and the hot object,

I did. The change in kinetic energy is the same.
 
  • #19
Oh, you need to use the relativistic kinetic energy. Sorry about that.
 

FAQ: Mass, Energy & Inertia: Impact of Trapping Energy in a Box

What is mass and how does it relate to energy and inertia?

Mass is a measure of an object's resistance to acceleration. It is related to energy through Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2, which states that mass and energy are interchangeable. Inertia is a property of matter that describes its tendency to resist changes in motion, and it is directly related to an object's mass.

How does trapping energy in a box affect its mass and inertia?

When energy is trapped in a box, its mass increases according to Einstein's equation. This is because the energy inside the box is adding to the total mass of the system. Inertia is also affected, as the added mass will increase the object's resistance to changes in motion.

What is the impact of trapping energy in a box on the surrounding environment?

The impact of trapping energy in a box depends on the amount of energy contained within it. If the energy is significant, it can cause changes in the environment such as an increase in temperature or pressure. This energy can also be harnessed for various purposes, such as generating electricity.

Can energy be trapped in a box indefinitely?

In theory, energy can be trapped in a box indefinitely, as long as the box is completely isolated from its surroundings. However, in reality, it is nearly impossible to create a perfectly isolated system, and energy will eventually leak out of the box in the form of radiation or other means.

How does the concept of mass-energy equivalence impact our understanding of the universe?

The concept of mass-energy equivalence has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe. It has helped us understand the source of energy in stars and nuclear reactions, and has led to advancements in nuclear energy and weapons. It has also played a crucial role in the development of Einstein's theory of relativity, which has revolutionized our understanding of space, time, and gravity.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
592
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Back
Top