Masters: Most Employable area to specialize in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keithmregan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Masters
AI Thread Summary
A bachelor's degree in Music Technology has led to a consideration of pursuing a master's in mechanical engineering, with a focus on job availability and pay. Specializing in thermal and fluid sciences is appealing, but there are concerns about limiting job prospects. The discussion emphasizes the importance of aligning educational choices with long-term career goals rather than just immediate job availability. Continuous learning and adaptability in a rapidly changing field are crucial for long-term success. Ultimately, defining the desired job role may provide clearer guidance for specialization decisions.
keithmregan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have an bachelor of science in Music Technology from Drexel. I am no longer interested in working as an audio engineer. I have been considering a masters in mechanical engineering for some time.

I realize that a masters is more specific and not as broad as an undergrad in mechanical engineering. I have to carefully decide what area to specialize in because I don't want to put myself in a situation where I can only get one kind of job.

In general, what is the best area to specialize in in terms of job availability and pay(especially for someone WITHOUT an engineering undergrad)? I know you can choose mechanics, controls or thermal and fluid sciences at Drexel. At Villanova you can just taylor the degree and pick the courses you want.

If I choose thermal and fluid sciences what kind of jobs might I be able to land?

I don't think that I am interested in controls. Mechanics is also not as appealing to me as thermal and fluid sciences, but nothing is set in stone at this point.

I am just reaching out and trying to gather information from people in the industry and I really appreciate any advice and guidance. I don't want to go through getting a masters and then not be able to find a job.

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you're worried about employment, why not work out what your best university course would be based on the job you wish to spend 30 years doing, rather than work out what job you can do based on 1 year's study?
 
I am trying to gather advice. yes, I should work in an area I WANT to work in, but I also want to not box myself into one type of job by specializing in an area that doesn't have good job prospects.
 
keithmregan said:
I am trying to gather advice. yes, I should work in an area I WANT to work in, but I also want to not box myself into one type of job by specializing in an area that doesn't have good job prospects.
Tough one. If you want to master a technical specialty and work in a job long-term, you're going to have to be a fortune teller AND lucky AND ready to learn throughout your career. Technologies change or get superseded all the time, so you've got to roll with the changes.

I worked in the pulp and paper industry in several positions, and over the course of less than 10 years, I saw the phase-out of pneumatic controllers with paper-disk recorders, and the ascendancy of the electronic controllers with paper roll-chart recorders, then the introduction of dedicated microprocessors to control specific processes, then the introduction of far more generalized computers with graphical interfaces, that communicated with process equipment through Allen-Bradley PLCs. That was a long time ago, and things have not stopped changing. In a dynamic field, your education cannot stop when you get another degree and then land a job, or you will find yourself looking for work in short notice.

Just something to think about... Instead of asking "can I get a job?" it might help you to consider "what kind of job do I want?" and prepare to watch your skills, duties, etc morph for years.
 
I recently attended a seminar by a senior engineer at Bell Helicopter, and he said that engineers with expertise in structural dynamics and vibrations have better job security than those that don't. I'm not sure that I believe it, but that's what he said.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top