Material Property Effects On Magnetic Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of material properties on the performance of a linear actuator, particularly regarding the shaft and shaft collar materials. The use of 1566 steel for the shaft and zinc-plated steel for the collars is questioned due to their potential to reduce the attractive force of the magnet and overall actuator performance. Suggestions include replacing the shaft with 303 stainless steel and using nylon or aluminum collars to minimize magnetic interference. The importance of a magnetic outer shell and end plates to guide the magnetic field is emphasized, as well as the need for non-magnetic materials for the shaft to avoid short-circuiting the magnetic path. The actuator's design is critiqued for potentially low frequency response and positioning accuracy due to the mass of iron components and inductance of the coil.
carpekd
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm building a linear actuator and I don't have much experience with magnetic circuits...

A rough sketch of what I'm building is attached. I'm trying to determine if the materials I'm using for the shaft and shaft collar will have a detrimental effect on overall force output. Right now, my shaft is made of 1566 steel and the shaft collars are zinc plated steel (don't know the material number, but it is magnetic). I've noticed that when the shaft, magnet, and shaft collars are assembled that the attractive force of the magnet is reduced vs. when the magnet is by itself. (I'm just putting a piece of metal close to it and felt the attractive force). I'm assuming that the shaft has a low magnetic reluctance and is directing a good bit of the flux through the shaft, but I'm not sure. I'm also assuming that this would reduce the performance of the actuator (overall force). My plan is to replace the shaft with a 303 stainless steel shaft and nylon or aluminum shaft collars. Would this be a sound plan? Could someone explain what is happening to the magnetic field in this application?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • actuator.gif
    actuator.gif
    7.5 KB · Views: 576
Engineering news on Phys.org
I do not understand how the proposed linear actuator will work.
What is the orientation of the coils?

You need to draw in the lines of magnetic field that you require.
You must work out where to place the magnetic conductors = iron? to make the field follow that path.

If you want it to operate fast with AC signals you will need to use iron powder based magnetic conductors.
The permanent magnets may not work well at AC because of skin depth in their conductive coating.
 
The coil will be a cylindrical coil with back iron on the outside (not shown). The coil will be energized with dc current and will operate on the voice coil principle. A similar commercial product is described here: http://www.designworldonline.com/moving-magnet-voice-coil-actuators/#_

My concern is the detrimental effects on overall force production due to magnetic field interactions with the shaft/shaft collar materials...
 
The shaft should be non-magnetic or it will short circuit the permanent magnet path.
The collars on the shaft should be magnetic as they are part of the magnetic circuit.
There needs to be a magnetic outer shell to carry the external field from one end to the other.
That shell should include magnetic end plates that guide the shaft.
The cross section area of the shell and endplates should be similar to PM section area.

The shaft will exert an axial force determined by DC current.
If solid iron is used for the shell and end plates there will be a slow response to changes in coil current.
 

Attachments

  • actuator2 .gif
    actuator2 .gif
    9 KB · Views: 535
A voice-coil has a moving coil in a permanent magnet field. The permanent magnet field can use thick iron components because the PM field does not need to change. The moving coil has a low mass and a high frequency response, maybe 10 kHz.

You are building a transducer that uses thick iron components about a solenoid coil with significant inductance. The mass of iron and the inductance of the coil will reduce the frequency response of the changes in field, probably to less than 1Hz.

Your armature has permanent magnets that have more mass than a voice-coil in an air-gap. But that does not really matter here since your stator field will be so stable.

Because the bandwidth of the control loop is so low, your actuator will be very hard to position accurately. It will need to be used in a way that applies a force, but does not move anything.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top