Programs Mathematical/Theoretical Physics MSc with High Teaching Quality

AI Thread Summary
A student nearing the completion of their physics Bachelor's degree is seeking insights into master's programs in mathematical and theoretical physics, emphasizing the importance of teaching quality over specialization. They express a desire for a broad understanding of physics without prematurely committing to a specific research path or career. The student is particularly interested in first-hand reports from alumni regarding the rigor, clarity, and depth of core courses in various programs. They aim to gather information from a diverse range of universities to inform their decision. The thread was ultimately closed due to forum policies against survey-type discussions.
ScipioAustrianus
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
I am about to finish my physics Bachelor’s degree at 19 years old, and I am looking for master’s programs in mathematical physics / theoretical physics (not sure which exactly yet).

A bit of personal context.

I feel that it would be premature for me to specialize at this stage given that I haven't even seen all fields of physics yet (I didn't really do rigid-body physics in the bachelor's and haven't done thermodynamics / statistical mechanics yet). I don't want to choose a research path yet for the same reason. I am unsure of what kind of job I want so I am not planning on including that in my considerations either. Choosing a PhD isn't a consideration either. The only thing that I am really adamant about is that I want the best general formation. I don't really care about having specific subjects (I definitely don't want an experimental focus in the master though), I care about the way those subjects are taught and approached. I am all about rigor, clarity and striving for real understanding. The main metric I am interested in is “teaching quality.” I think my notion of “teaching quality” is best described through examples, so I have added two appendices, one short and one long, of positive and negative aspects of my own program.

My idea is to collect first-hand reports from similarly-minded students / alumni of master’s programs in mathematical / theoretical physics about how the core courses were / are taught (rigor, clarity, breadth) in their program. This way I can accumulate some kind of information for a wide range of different universities.

If you’ve studied or are studying a Master’s in any physics program, I would greatly appreciate your first-hand insights on how the core courses were taught, especially regarding rigor, clarity, and depth. Information like course name and language would also be welcomed. Even if your focus wasn’t purely theoretical or mathematical, your perspective on teaching quality and approach is valuable to me. Replies from any country are welcome.




Appendices:
A short evaluation of my own program is available in Appendix A. For more detailed examples and discussion, see Appendix B. Both are optional reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScipioAustrianus said:
I am about to finish my physics Bachelor’s degree at 19 years old
Congratulations, that is very impressive. :smile:

ScipioAustrianus said:
My idea is to collect first-hand reports from similarly-minded students / alumni of master’s programs in mathematical / theoretical physics about how the core courses were / are taught (rigor, clarity, breadth) in their program. This way I can accumulate some kind of information for a wide range of different universities.

If you’ve studied or are studying a Master’s in any physics program, I would greatly appreciate your first-hand insights on how the core courses were taught, especially regarding rigor, clarity, and depth. Information like course name and language would also be welcomed. Even if your focus wasn’t purely theoretical or mathematical, your perspective on teaching quality and approach is valuable to me. Replies from any country are welcome.
Unfortunately due to anti-phishing reasons, we do not allow survey-type threads at PF. So this intro thread is now closed.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top