I Matrix form of metric component transformation?

farfromdaijoubu
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Question about the matrix form of a metric transformation from coordinate system to another.
The transformation of the metric from unprimed to primed coordinates is given in Moore's GR workbook as:
##g'_{uv} = \frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{'u}}

\frac{\partial x^b}{\partial x^{'v}}g_{ab}##

In matrix form, by matching indices on both sides (so that u and v are the outer 'indices'), I got
##(g'_{uv}) = \left(\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{'u}}\right)^T (g_{ab})


\left( \frac{\partial x^b}{\partial x^{'v}} \right)##


But on pg. 146 of Schutz's GR textbook, he writes the matrix form of the transformation as $$(g') = $(\Lambda) (g) \Lambda)^T$$, where ##\Lambda = \left(\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{u'}} \right)##.

How did he get this result? Did I misunderstand something? Because I don't think it's equivalent to what I got...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Different books may have different definitions of which of the indices of ##\partial x^a/\partial x^{u’}## is to be interpreted as the row index.
 
  • Like
Likes farfromdaijoubu and Ibix
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top