MHB Max of $st+tu+uv$ given $s,t,u,v$ sum 63

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$
 
MarkFL said:
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$

Awesome, MarkFL! :D
 
anemone said:
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.

$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum
 
kaliprasad said:
$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum

This was posted at http://mathhelpboards.com/challenge-questions-puzzles-28/find-maximum-sum-11061.html
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top