Maximizing quantity which is a product of matrices/vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter AcidRainLiTE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
AcidRainLiTE
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
I am trying to follow the following reasoning:

Given a known matrix A, we want to find w that maximizes the quantity

w'Aw​

(where w' denotes the transpose of w) subject to the constraint w'w = 1.

To do so, use a lagrange multiplier, L:

w'Aw + L(w'w - 1)
and differentiate to obtain

Aw = Lw.​

Thus, we seek the eigenvector of A with the largest eigenvalue.​


I do not understand how they differentiated w'Aw + L(w'w-1) to get Aw = Lw. Can someone explain to me what is going on at that step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would probably help to write things down explicitly in terms of components,

$$ m = w'Aw + L(w'w - 1) = \sum_{ij} A_{ij} w_i w_j + L \left( \sum_i w_i^2 -1 \right).$$

This is a function of the ##n## variables ##w_i##. At an extremum, ##\partial m /\partial w_k =0##. If you actually work out this set of equations, you'll see they are the components of the eigenvalue equation that you quoted. You'll need to use the fact that ##A## can be taken to be a symmetric matrix.
 
Both posts were helpful. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top