Measurement of speed using redshift or blueshift

In summary, the solution on the textbook shows a velocity of 13000m/s towards Earth, which causes the light to be blue-shifted. This is indicated by the star's H lines being at a shorter wavelength than observed in the laboratory, suggesting that the star is moving away from Earth and is therefore red shifted. The concept of wavelength and frequency can be compared to the sound of a train, where shorter wavelengths (higher frequency) indicate the train is coming towards you, while longer wavelengths (lower frequency) indicate it is moving away. However, there seems to be some confusion as the statement contradicts itself regarding the train's sound and the light's wavelength.
  • #1
mugen715
9
0
Homework Statement
One wavelength in the hydrogen spectrum of light from Ursa Majoris is 486.112 nm. In the laboratory, this spectral line is found to have a wavelength of 486.133nm. Determine the velocity of Ursa Majoris relative to Earth. (speed of light = 3.0 x 10^8 m/s)
Relevant Equations
doppler effect equation
The solution on my textbook is 13000m/s toward Earth as the light is blue-shifted

I'm able to calculate the magnitude of velocity (13000m/s), but i don't understand why thus is blue-shifted? Since in the lab, the light's wavelength observed is slightly higher than light from Ursa Majoris. So my thought is red-shift and move away from earth. Any any explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your statement says that one of the star's H lines is at a shorter wavelength (ie: higher frequency) than the same line achieved in the lab (which we can take to be the reference result).

When you're standing next to the tracks and the train zooms by, does the wavelength of the sound of its horn from the cab decrease ? or increase.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
When the train coming towards me, the wavelength of sound is shorter (higher frequency) but when the train moves away from me it's wavelength is longer (low frequency)

The star's H lines is at a shorter wavelength than observed in the laboratory (low frequency is observed), that means the star must be moving away from the Earth and is red shifted

I double checked I didn't read the question wrong
 
  • #4
mugen715 said:
When the train coming towards me, the wavelength of sound is shorter (higher frequency) but when the train moves away from me it's wavelength is longer (low frequency)

The star's H lines is at a shorter wavelength than observed in the laboratory (low frequency is observed), that means the star must be moving away from the Earth and is red shifted

I double checked I didn't read the question wrong
Red is longer wavelength than blue.
 
  • #5
wavelength is the inverse of frequency.
 
  • #6
mugen715 said:
When the train coming towards me, the wavelength of sound is shorter (higher frequency) but when the train moves away from me it's wavelength is longer (low frequency)

The star's H lines is at a shorter wavelength than observed in the laboratory (low frequency is observed), that means the star must be moving away from the Earth and is red shifted

I double checked I didn't read the question wrong
You are contradicting yourself. Yes, sound that you hear that is higher than normal = coming toward you. Light that is shorter wavelength (bluer) also means coming toward you.
 

FAQ: Measurement of speed using redshift or blueshift

How does redshift or blueshift affect the measurement of speed?

Redshift and blueshift are phenomena that occur when an object is moving away or towards an observer, respectively. This shift in the wavelength of light can be used to determine the speed of the object, as the greater the shift, the faster the object is moving.

Is redshift or blueshift a more accurate method of measuring speed?

Both redshift and blueshift can be used to measure speed, and the accuracy depends on the specific circumstances. For example, redshift may be more accurate for objects that are moving away at high speeds, while blueshift may be more accurate for objects that are moving towards the observer at high speeds.

Can redshift or blueshift be used to measure the speed of any object?

Redshift and blueshift can only be used to measure the speed of objects that emit light, such as stars and galaxies. This method cannot be used for objects that do not emit light, such as planets or asteroids.

How do scientists account for other factors that may affect the measurement of speed using redshift or blueshift?

Scientists take into account other factors such as the distance between the observer and the object, the gravitational pull of other objects, and the expansion of the universe. These factors can affect the measurement of speed and must be considered when using redshift or blueshift to determine an object's velocity.

Are there any limitations to using redshift or blueshift to measure speed?

There are some limitations to using redshift or blueshift to measure speed. For example, the accuracy of the measurement decreases for objects that are farther away, as the redshift or blueshift may be too small to accurately determine the speed. Additionally, the method may be affected by the angle at which the object is moving relative to the observer's line of sight.

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
953
Replies
39
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top