A Method of calculating the vacuum energy divergence

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curved space Qft
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
In the book, quantum fields in curved space, when calculating the vacuum energy divergence for scalar fields, it reads:
$$\sum_{\mathbf k}\omega/2=(L^2/4\pi)^{(n-1)/2}\frac 1 {\Gamma ((n-1)/2)} \int_0^\infty (k^2+m^2)^{1/2}k^{n-2}dk .$$ This divergence can be usefully analyzed by performing the integral with ##n## continued away from integral values to obtain $$-L^{n-1}2^{-n-1}\pi^{-n/2}m^n \Gamma(-n/2).$$

I could get the answer by letting ##k=m\tan t ## and using the properties of Beta functions and Gamma functions, but I still do not understand what it means by saying "with ##n## continued away from integral values".

Thanks ahead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
TL;DR Summary: When calculating the vacuum energy divergence, an author said, "This divergence can be usefully analysed by performing the integral with n continued away from integral values". What does it mean?
Just after your quotation from pg. 16 of Birrell & Davies, Quantum field theory in curved space, it states:
"This method of temporarily making divergent quantities finite by continuing the dimension of spacetime away from integer values forms the basis of dimensional regularization (see chapter 6)."
What don't you understand about this explanation? Are you familiar with dimensional regularization?
 
Thanks, @renormalize. I mistakenly thought the integral value was somehow related to the integration in the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes renormalize
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top