Michelson Interferometer with a lens

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework question related to the Michelson Interferometer and the confusion surrounding it. A user requests a solution manual, but others emphasize the importance of working through the problem independently to enhance understanding. Suggestions include creating sketches to clarify the setup and writing down relevant equations with clear definitions of symbols. Participants encourage checking the consistency between the work done and the problem statement, particularly regarding fringe patterns. Engaging with the material directly is deemed essential for effective learning.
zefanya
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
This Michelson interferometer is based on a laser with a wavelength of 513 nm. The laser beam first passes though a negative lens with f = -20 mm and then through a positive lens with f = 200 mm. The distance between the lenses is 160 mm. The optical path length from the last lens to the end screen is for the first arm 1200 mm and for the second 1210 mm. How many interference fringes are visible with a radius of 80 mm?
Relevant Equations
2d = mλ
2 d = (m + 1/2)λ
Hello everyone, i have a homework but I'm so confused how to solved it , can someone make a solution manual for this homework?, Thankyou.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @zefanya ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !

with a radius of 80 mm
'with' ? or 'within'? Makes a difference !
zefanya said:
solution manual for this homework
That would only rob you of the exercise, so it is utterly unproductive. Just work your way through:
  • Start with some sketches to clarify the setup
  • Jotting down equations is one thing. Clarify what the symbols stand for and where they fit in the drawing
  • Check if your work and the problem statement agree. Fringes ?
##\ ##
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top