Middle of Earth: Atom or No Atom?

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbots
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
At the center of the Earth, where gravity equals zero, the concept of an atom's presence raises questions about atomic structure and gravitational interactions. The net gravity at this point is influenced by external factors, such as the Moon's gravitational pull, which complicates the idea of a singular center. The gravitational field is dynamic, changing with time and location, potentially leading to gravito-magnetic effects that could impact Earth's pressure and temperature. However, the Moon's influence is primarily felt at the surface, affecting tides rather than deeply penetrating the Earth's core. Overall, while the discussion brings up intriguing points, the practical implications of gravity's effects at the Earth's center remain uncertain.
binbots
Messages
170
Reaction score
3
At the point where all gravity equals 0, (middle of the earth) is there a atom. Or does it lie between 2 atoms. Is this something that has not be measured because gravity is to small at this point. Or is just s pointless question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi binbots! :smile:

the point at which the net gravity is zero has to take account of the Moon …

it turns out to be a long way from the centre of the Earth (I forget the exact amount, but you can easily calculate it yourself :wink:), and of course it moves around inside the Earth as the Moon moves :smile:
 
Net gravity is only a sum of all the gravity interaction together. There is no necessary center as no specific atom acts as center or medium. Treat it as if it were many indivual gravitational fields rather than one field.
 
I hadn't given the OP's question much thought before but upon just thinking about it it does raise some questions.

given the gravitational field would be changing in respect to time and location due to the balance between the two bodies and there rotational frequency. wouldn't this create a gravito-magnetic effect a bit larger than the just the Earth itself? and the moving field being asymmetric to the center line of the Earth cause a constant shift in the pressure and temperature of Earth at it's location? would this still be the case if the Earth moon was a binary system and not a satellite one?
 
My thoughts...

Gravity, pervasive as it is, is VERY weak.
That our moon's gravitational influence affects oceanic tides should not be further presumed that it affects much deeper into the core of our Earth with any substantial/noticeable influence.
Not sure though.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top