Modern Physics-Einstein's Postulates/Relativistic Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter giraffe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to the relativistic Doppler effect, specifically how to calculate the speed of a galaxy moving away from Earth based on the observed wavelength shift of hydrogen emission lines. Participants express confusion about applying Einstein's postulates and developing the necessary equations for the problem. One user successfully calculates the speed as 0.8c but critiques the lack of explanatory guidance in responses received. The conversation highlights the need for clearer explanations and encourages independent research on the relativistic Doppler effect. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between velocity and wavelength in the context of modern physics.
giraffe
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


12. one of the strongest emission lines observed from distant galaxies comes from hydrogen and has a wavelength of 122 nm(in the ultraviolet region).
a) how fast must a galaxy be moving away from us in order for that line to be observed in the visible region at 366 nm?
b) what would be the wavelength of the line if that galaxy were moving toward us at the same speed?

Homework Equations


the book I am using has the chapter separated into smaller sections as you read through it. so it has the problems separated into these same sections so you know what information to look for or need. book is modern physics 3rd edition by kenneth krane

so this question is in the consequences of einstein's postulates. the first one is the principle of relativity and the second one is the principle of the constancy of the speed of light. i do know that this problem would have to do with relativistic velocity addition.

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't know/understand how to develop equations from these two postulates. the book has an example with equations for the relativistic velocity addition but how does wavelength fit into this? this leads me to believe that i need to somehow draw a picture and develop specific equations for this problem. if this is the case, how do i go about doing such a thing with such minimal information? i know that i would need to use us(earth) as one observer point(o) and the other galaxy as another(o').

thanks for all your continued help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This question is concerned with relativistic doppler effect:
Attached please find the equation.
giraffe said:

Homework Statement


12. one of the strongest emission lines observed from distant galaxies comes from hydrogen and has a wavelength of 122 nm(in the ultraviolet region).
a) how fast must a galaxy be moving away from us in order for that line to be observed in the visible region at 366 nm?
b) what would be the wavelength of the line if that galaxy were moving toward us at the same speed?


Homework Equations


the book I am using has the chapter separated into smaller sections as you read through it. so it has the problems separated into these same sections so you know what information to look for or need. book is modern physics 3rd edition by kenneth krane

so this question is in the consequences of einstein's postulates. the first one is the principle of relativity and the second one is the principle of the constancy of the speed of light. i do know that this problem would have to do with relativistic velocity addition.

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't know/understand how to develop equations from these two postulates. the book has an example with equations for the relativistic velocity addition but how does wavelength fit into this? this leads me to believe that i need to somehow draw a picture and develop specific equations for this problem. if this is the case, how do i go about doing such a thing with such minimal information? i know that i would need to use us(earth) as one observer point(o) and the other galaxy as another(o').

thanks for all your continued help.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-09-13 at 1.45.41 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-09-13 at 1.45.41 PM.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 770
so letting lambda be the 366 and lambda sub 0(or lambda not) be the 122 and solving the equation for v i get 0.8c.
 
Well td21... That was a bit useless as a method of helping the student towards an answer. Not only did you simply give the student a formula, but did so without any explanatory text or looking at their proposed solution.
 
Yeah Giraffe, if you plug n chug that is what you get. *sigh*
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks quantum. I'm only 2-3 wks into school so I'm not quite sure of the type of answers I should be getting as my professor just gives a lot of historical information in lecture but no example problems.
 
Quantum Braket said:
Well td21... That was a bit useless as a method of helping the student towards an answer. Not only did you simply give the student a formula, but did so without any explanatory text or looking at their proposed solution.

I apologize for giving little explanation on the formula given and the term relativistic doppler effect. I will improve on my approach next time by giving more explanations to the students.
I actually hope the student can look into relativistic doppler effect by himself in the library or in the world wide web and ponder over the equation I gave him. I should not give him the equation.
I apologize for doing so and regret it. I will improve on my answering techniques and approaches in the future.
 
Back
Top