Quantum Modern Quantum Mechanics 3rd Ed: J. J. Sakurai & Jim Napolitano Review

AI Thread Summary
Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Edition, by J. J. Sakurai and Jim Napolitano is recognized as an excellent resource for learning quantum mechanics, particularly suited for advanced learners, such as senior undergraduates or graduate students. The book offers a sophisticated treatment of non-relativistic quantum theory but is not recommended for beginners due to its assumption that readers have prior knowledge of fundamental concepts like the Schrödinger equation and Hamiltonian mechanics. It is advised to skip the chapter on relativistic quantum mechanics and instead consult introductory texts on quantum field theory for that topic. For those seeking a more accessible introduction to quantum mechanics, alternatives such as Townsend's book or Young and Freedman's chapters are suggested, as they cater to less experienced learners. Additionally, A. I. Lvovsky's Quantum Physics: An Introduction Based on Photons is highlighted as a potentially approachable option for beginners.
Vectronix
Messages
64
Reaction score
2
Is Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Edition, by J. J. Sakurai and Jim Napolitano a good book to learn quantum mechanics from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vectronix said:
Is Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Edition, by J. J. Sakurai and Jim Napolitano a good book to learn quantum mechanics from?
It is excellent, but it's quite an advanced treatment - perhaps better for senior undergraduates.
 
  • Like
Likes Fakhrul Islam, Lord Jestocost, vanhees71 and 1 other person
PeroK said:
It is excellent, but it's quite an advanced treatment - perhaps better for senior undergraduates.
Thank you!
 
Skip the chapter on "relativistic quantum mechanics" and read a good introductory textbook on relativistic quantum field theory instead. Otherwise it's an excellent textbook about non-relativistic quantum theory.
 
vanhees71 said:
Skip the chapter on "relativistic quantum mechanics" and read a good introductory textbook on relativistic quantum field theory instead. Otherwise it's an excellent textbook about non-relativistic quantum theory.
Thank you for the advice!
 
I’m very fond of Shankar’s book. I have only skimmed Sakurai, since I mainly focus on Mathematics nowadays, but Sakurai, from what I read, was very good. Provided you have the physics background…
 
I'm studying Sakurai now to keep my mind busy during the summer. It is not an introductory book. He assumes you've already completed a course in quantum mechanics. His intention is to show you that a linear algebra-based approach can provide a deeper understanding of QM. He assumes (explicitly stated!) that the reader has already seen the Schrodinger equation, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, etc., etc. He also assumes that you're already well-versed in Hamiltonian mechanics (not just what a Hamiltonian is, but actively compares to deeper results that require completing a good classical mechanics class). It is a textbook that would serve well for grad students, but would be an awful choice as an introduction. I don't even think the reader would appreciate the elegance and point of what he is doing if they had not already slogged through the wave mechanics approach.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, PeroK, dextercioby and 1 other person
  • #10
DavidW said:
It is a textbook that would serve well for grad students

A little OT, but it's interesting how different parts of the world/universities have different apprach to studying physics. I studied at Warsaw University, and this:

DavidW said:
that the reader has already seen the Schrodinger equation, Heisenberg uncertainty principle, etc., etc. (...) Hamiltonian mechanics (not just what a Hamiltonian is, but actively compares to deeper results that require completing a good classical mechanics class

we already learnt by the end of 2nd year of undergrad/bachelor studies. We had proper QM lectures (using linear algebra and all that) in the first semester of 3rd yeard. It makes me appreciate my alma mater even more 😁
 
  • #11
I haven't heard of it, but the posts above suggest it's for more advanced learners.

If you want something more basic, and you're not intending to dive very deep into what's going on, then Young and Freedman have 2 chapters which introduce QM and I found them very approachable as someone whose physics knowledge goes little beyond what was covered in the rest of the book (the sort of things you would encounter in 1st year of Undergrad I think: but don't quote me on that)

Alternatively, I've heard that A. I. Lvovsky, Quantum Physics: An Introduction Based on Photons is quite good: I'm planning on studying it in November as part of a programme run by Oxford University to teach curious Pre-Uni students QM. The prerequisites for taking the course aren't much, just a knowledge of some basic maths and physics:
Good knowledge of school math and physics is required, including the basics of:
  • trigonometry
  • general problem-solving skills
  • theory of probabilities (including the notions of expectation value and variance)
From this I think it's safe to infer that it's probably a fairly approachable book.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top