Molecular Orbital Theory: Build MOs for Diatomic Molecules

Click For Summary
Understanding molecular orbital (MO) theory involves interpreting MO diagrams for diatomic molecules. The discussion highlights the energy levels of 2p∏ orbitals in B2, C2, and N2 being higher than in O2 and F2. This difference is attributed to the increased s-p splitting across the period from boron to fluorine, where the repulsion between anti-bonding sigma orbitals from s-orbitals and bonding sigma orbitals from p orbitals affects their energy levels. In B, C, and N, this repulsion causes the bonding p-sigma orbitals to be positioned above the bonding pi orbitals. However, in O2 and F2, the orbitals are sufficiently spaced that this repulsion does not alter the order of sigma and pi orbitals derived from p. While the ordering of sigma and pi orbitals is accurate, the absolute energy levels presented in the diagrams may not be correct.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/Molecular_Orbital_Theory/How_to_Build_Molecular_Orbitals


Hi,

I'm currently trying to understand MO theory and how diagrams are made and interpreted. I stumbled across this website and it shows the general MO diagrams for different diatomic molecules.

It also shows the 2p∏ of B2, C2 and N2 as being higher in energy than compared to O2 and F2. I was trying to reason it out and considered that since there will be more ∏ antibonding orbitals for the O2 and F2 that this is the reason why. But aren't their structural constraints to this reasoning? Aren't ∏ orbitals of a specific energy due to their perpendicular orientation and their sideways overlapping? Why exactly is their energy lower in the MO diagrams? I'm assuming my explanation for this is incorrect so so any clarification on the above matters would be great!

Thank you! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
These pictures are only correct as far as the ordering of the sigma and pi orbitals are concerned however, the absolute energies of these orbitals is probably incorrect.
The point is that the s-p splitting increases in a period (that is from B to F, in our case).
The anti-bonding sigma formed from the s-orbitals and the bonding sigma from the p orbitals repell, that is why the bonding p-sigma is shifted above the bonding pi orbitals in case of B, C and N. In O2 and F2, the orbitals are too far appart, so that this repulsion won't change the order of the sigma and pi orbitals derived from p.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
DrDu said:
These pictures are only correct as far as the ordering of the sigma and pi orbitals are concerned however, the absolute energies of these orbitals is probably incorrect.
The point is that the s-p splitting increases in a period (that is from B to F, in our case).
The anti-bonding sigma formed from the s-orbitals and the bonding sigma from the p orbitals repell, that is why the bonding p-sigma is shifted above the bonding pi orbitals in case of B, C and N. In O2 and F2, the orbitals are too far appart, so that this repulsion won't change the order of the sigma and pi orbitals derived from p.

That was a great explanation. Thank you!
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K