Moment of inertia for Concave Polygon

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for a concave polygon, triangulating the shape is a viable approach, allowing for the summation of the moments of the individual triangles. An alternative method involves decomposing the concave polygon into two convex polygons, where one represents the material and the other represents the void, combining their moments with opposite signs. This discussion highlights the importance of these techniques in simplifying the calculation process. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification on these methods. Overall, triangulation and decomposition are effective strategies for determining the moment of inertia in concave polygons.
SaadAhmad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Moment of inertia for Concave Polygon

While working on a simulation I ran into this problem. I'm trying to calculate the moment of inertia for a concave polygon. The polygon is made of N vertices (Also the edges are straight lines). I've done a bit of researching however I've only found resources for convex polygons.

I'm thinking of triangulating the polygon and then going from there, but I don't know how to actually use it.

I will be grateful for any help on a general way of calculating the moment of inertia for a concave polygon


Saad
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you triangulate the polygon, can't you just sum the moments of the triangles? In the case of simple polygons you can also use the trick of trying to decompose it into two convex polygons, where one is the place where material is, and the other is the place where it isn't and add them with opposite signs.
 
Ah yes, I was over thinking it. Thanks for your help
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top