Moment of Inertia: Ignoring Small Bond Axis Molecule

In summary, The moment of inertia of a molecule about the bond axis is small enough to be ignored because its value is on the order of 10-10 compared to the moments of inertia for rotations about axes perpendicular to the bond. This is due to the fact that the bond length, which is the average distance between nuclei of two bonded atoms in a molecule, is squared to calculate the moment of inertia, while the nuclear diameter or radius is squared to calculate the moment of inertia about a perpendicular axis.
  • #71
gracy said:
But how can i assume this?this is what my question is difference between bond axis and x axis.
... you are free to call the bond axis anything you like. If you don't like "x" how about "y" or "z" (z is a very popular choice because: cylindrical coordinates)... or "bob" or "kate" or anything you like. It's just a bit of shorthand.

Earlier on - you drew a diagram with a big arrow on it labelled "x-axis", and you immediately ran against a convention in maths drawings that an arrow with an axis label written next to it is the axis in question but you intended it to indicate the axis. That's just you learning how to talk in maths, and it seems to have got you sidetracked a bit.

One of the things that can happen to people as they learn maths is they start thinking of x-y-z as somehow being fixed in space and everything else is positioned against these fixed axes. But this is not the case. You can choose any direction and call it anything you like... it's just that Cartesian axes are handy labels. As soon as we pick something else, we then have to write down a bunch of stuff to define what we mean and that's already been done for x-y-z 400-odd ago(?) by Rene Decartes. So we all use his by default.

In physics, our axes are chosen to correspond to some physical object or process ... in your case it makes sense to put one cartesian axis along the bond-axis. It does not matter where the others point. I chose x because you seemed to be used to using the x axis. But you can pick another one if you like. You don't even have to line up the cartesian axes to the bond if you don't want to - it makes only cosmetic differences to the final result while making the calculation itself a lot harder.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
736
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
905
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top